Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Oct 18, 2013·MTS Centre, Winnipeg

St. Louis Blues 3, Winnipeg Jets 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 68% of the time.

WPG winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
STL21101218012332
WPG1901028023429

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:43STLDavid BackesAssists: T.J. Oshie · Snap, 0.20 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:30WPGOlli JokinenAssists: Matt Halischuk · Slap, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P1 18:14STLAlexander SteenUnassisted · Snap, 0.07 xG2–1
  4. P3 3:34STLAlexander SteenAssists: David Backes, Jay Bouwmeester · Wrist, 0.32 xG3–1
  5. P3 13:13WPGEvander KaneAssists: Bryan Little · Slap, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:06WPGToby EnstromAssists: Dustin Byfuglien, Blake Wheeler · Slap, 0.04 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. WPG Blake Wheeler stopped
  2. 2. STL T.J. Oshie scored
  3. 3. WPG Andrew Ladd scored
  4. 4. STL Alexander Steen scored
  5. 5. WPG Bryan Little scored
  6. 6. STL Vladimir Tarasenko stopped
  7. 7. WPG Evander Kane stopped
  8. 8. STL Vladimir Sobotka stopped
  9. 9. WPG Anthony Peluso stopped
  10. 10. STL Kevin Shattenkirk stopped
  11. 11. WPG Michael Frolik stopped
  12. 12. STL Patrik Berglund stopped
  13. 13. WPG Olli Jokinen scored
  14. 14. STL Chris Stewart stopped
Penalties (5)
  1. P1 3:00WPGEvander Kane: Elbowing2 min
  2. P2 3:53WPGEvander Kane: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 6:28STLIan Cole: Holding2 min
  4. P2 11:30WPGToby Enstrom: Delaying game2 min
  5. OT 4:20STLPatrik Berglund: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WPG
48% to win52% to win
← STL attackWPG attack →
  1. P1 20:00Little won the faceoff against Backes
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLWPG
32Shots on goal29
3.5Expected goals2.4
62Shot attempts66
33Faceoffs won27
3Power plays2
4Penalty minutes6
21Hits28
21Blocked shots18
11Giveaways14
3Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestSteen – Backes – Oshie13:54

    xG 0.99–0.41 (71%)attempts 15–12goals 3–1

  2. Berglund – Tarasenko – Schwartz10:58

    xG 0.95–0.48 (66%)attempts 15–10goals 0–0

  3. Cracknell – Reaves – Paajarvi6:09

    xG 0.38–0.20 (66%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  4. Roy – Sobotka – Stewart9:18

    xG 0.07–0.45 (14%)attempts 4–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBouwmeester – Pietrangelo18:22

    xG 1.45–0.66 (69%)attempts 21–17goals 1–0

  2. Polak – Cole13:10

    xG 0.56–0.41 (58%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0

  3. Leopold – Shattenkirk14:16

    xG 0.59–0.60 (50%)attempts 16–17goals 0–1

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. bestLadd – Wheeler – Little2:04

    xG 0.18–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  2. Jokinen – Halischuk – Wright3:12

    xG 0.20–0.08 (70%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  3. Wheeler – Little – Kane12:55

    xG 0.91–0.82 (53%)attempts 19–10goals 2–2

  4. Jokinen – Peluso – Cormier4:24

    xG 0.04–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEnstrom – Byfuglien5:29

    xG 0.53–0.13 (81%)attempts 9–3goals 1–0

  2. Enstrom – Bogosian13:44

    xG 0.86–0.50 (63%)attempts 12–15goals 1–0

  3. Stuart – Clitsome2:56

    xG 0.00–0.12 (0%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WPG 2.4 xGSTL 3.5 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WPGSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WPG's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WPG is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #197 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.02 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 3% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50WPG 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +42 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 68% of the time.

WPG winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (WPG − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).