Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Oct 18, 2013·Honda Center, Anaheim

Phoenix Coyotes 2, Anaheim Ducks 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 64% of the time.

ANA winsPHX wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PHX01211216023232
ANA111014110044339

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:38ANATeemu SelanneAssists: Mathieu Perreault · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P2 11:11PHXAntoine VermetteAssists: Keith Yandle, Mike Ribeiro · Deflected, 0.06 xG1–1
  3. P3 7:54PHXRostislav KleslaAssists: Martin Hanzal, Shane Doan · Slap, 0.04 xG2–1
  4. P3 17:58ANANick BoninoUnassisted · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. ANA Nick Bonino scored
  2. 2. PHX Mikkel Boedker stopped
  3. 3. ANA Ryan Getzlaf stopped
  4. 4. PHX Radim Vrbata scored
  5. 5. ANA Corey Perry scored
  6. 6. PHX Mike Ribeiro scored
  7. 7. ANA Saku Koivu stopped
  8. 8. PHX Antoine Vermette stopped
  9. 9. ANA Teemu Selanne scored
  10. 10. PHX Oliver Ekman-Larsson scored
  11. 11. ANA Jakob Silfverberg scored
  12. 12. PHX Shane Doan stopped
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 7:36ANAAndrew Cogliano: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 13:18PHXRostislav Klesla: Holding2 min
  3. P1 13:18ANAFrancois Beauchemin: High sticking2 min
  4. P1 19:30PHXKeith Yandle: High sticking double minor4 min
  5. P2 9:05ANASami Vatanen: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 15:52ANAJakob Silfverberg: Holding2 min
  7. P2 18:12PHXLauri Korpikoski: Charging2 min
  8. P2 18:51ANACorey Perry: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 2:34ANAJakob Silfverberg: Too many men on the ice2 min
  10. P3 4:25ANAAndrew Cogliano: Slashing2 min
  11. P3 9:56PHXAntoine Vermette: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHX00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0ANA
48% to win52% to win
← PHX attackANA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Vermette won the faceoff against Perreault
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHXANA
32Shots on goal39
2.2Expected goals3.0
59Shot attempts67
43Faceoffs won27
6Power plays4
10Penalty minutes14
26Hits19
20Blocked shots15
14Giveaways14
6Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Phoenix Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestRibeiro – Moss – Korpikoski6:54

    xG 0.33–0.01 (97%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

  2. Vrbata – Hanzal – Boedker9:10

    xG 0.18–0.19 (49%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  3. Halpern – Bissonnette – Chipchura2:31

    xG 0.02–0.10 (19%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  4. Doan – Vermette – Klinkhammer11:11

    xG 0.17–0.28 (38%)attempts 4–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKlesla – Schlemko13:14

    xG 0.36–0.23 (61%)attempts 14–13goals 1–0

  2. Morris – Yandle10:41

    xG 0.40–0.39 (51%)attempts 12–11goals 1–1

  3. Michalek – Ekman-Larsson12:16

    xG 0.32–0.30 (51%)attempts 6–11goals 0–0

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestGetzlaf – Perry – Penner11:11

    xG 0.89–0.28 (76%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0

  2. Selanne – Perreault – Silfverberg7:47

    xG 0.38–0.11 (77%)attempts 11–8goals 1–1

  3. Koivu – Winnik – Cogliano7:20

    xG 0.07–0.10 (39%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  4. Bonino – Palmieri – Etem5:24

    xG 0.10–0.27 (27%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestLovejoy – Fowler12:18

    xG 0.83–0.14 (86%)attempts 17–7goals 0–0

  2. Beauchemin – Lindholm12:18

    xG 0.38–0.36 (51%)attempts 15–11goals 2–0

  3. Allen – Beauchemin2:46

    xG 0.08–0.19 (29%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

ANA 3.0 xGPHX 2.2 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

ANAPHX

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

ANA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line ANA is favoured, below it PHX. Dots are goals.

Excitement 74/100 · #256 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.02 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 8% (winner's lowest chance)
PHX 100%5050%50ANA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 64% of the time.

ANA winsPHX wins

Simulated goal difference (ANA − PHX), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).