Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Oct 22, 2013·Air Canada Centre, Toronto

Anaheim Ducks 2, Toronto Maple Leafs 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 64% of the time.

TOR winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA1616013225
TOR02310111423

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:38ANANick BoninoAssists: Patrick Maroon, Jakob Silfverberg · Snap, 0.16 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:59ANAMathieu PerreaultAssists: Sami Vatanen, Emerson Etem · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–0
  3. P2 7:44TORPhil KesselPPAssists: James van Riemsdyk, Cody Franson · Wrist, 0.42 xG2–1
  4. P2 9:03TORDion PhaneufAssists: Josh Leivo, Dave Bolland · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–2
  5. P2 16:09TORPhil KesselGWGAssists: Paul Ranger · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P3 8:11TORPhil KesselAssists: James van Riemsdyk · Snap, 0.13 xG2–4
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 0:57ANABen Lovejoy: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 10:24TORDion Phaneuf: Interference2 min
  3. P2 2:46ANABryan Allen: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 6:48ANACorey Perry: Boarding2 min · PPG
  5. P2 10:09TORJay McClement: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 10:42TORJames van Riemsdyk: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 0:00TORCarl Gunnarsson: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 0:00ANACorey Perry: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 10:49TORPaul Ranger: Holding2 min
  10. P3 13:01ANAJakob Silfverberg: Penalty shot holding on breakaway0 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TOR
48% to win52% to win
← ANA attackTOR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kadri won the faceoff against Getzlaf
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANATOR
25Shots on goal23
2.8Expected goals2.1
68Shot attempts44
41Faceoffs won26
4Power plays3
8Penalty minutes10
20Hits39
14Blocked shots21
13Giveaways17
5Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestSelanne – Perreault – Etem5:52

    xG 0.52–0.15 (78%)attempts 7–6goals 0–1

  2. Getzlaf – Perry – Maroon3:52

    xG 0.28–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–0goals 0–0

  3. Bonino – Maroon – Silfverberg5:40

    xG 0.17–0.05 (78%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  4. Getzlaf – Perry – Palmieri7:05

    xG 0.27–0.19 (59%)attempts 6–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBeauchemin – Lindholm12:59

    xG 0.40–0.27 (60%)attempts 10–8goals 0–1

  2. Allen – Vatanen12:14

    xG 0.52–0.40 (57%)attempts 22–8goals 1–0

  3. Lovejoy – Fowler9:39

    xG 0.21–0.15 (58%)attempts 6–8goals 0–2

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. bestOrr – McClement – Bolland4:36

    xG 0.35–0.08 (81%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  2. McClement – Bolland – Leivo4:35

    xG 0.05–0.05 (48%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Orr – Bodie – Smith3:04

    xG 0.00–0.17 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–1

  4. Lupul – Raymond – Kadri13:38

    xG 0.47–0.73 (39%)attempts 13–14goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Franson – Rielly11:16

    xG 0.47–0.48 (50%)attempts 10–15goals 0–2

  2. Ranger – Gardiner13:40

    xG 0.26–0.48 (35%)attempts 6–13goals 0–0

  3. Phaneuf – Gunnarsson8:59

    xG 0.02–0.41 (5%)attempts 4–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TOR 2.1 xGANA 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TORANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TOR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TOR is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 64/100 · #384 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.31 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 16% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50TOR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 64% of the time.

TOR winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (TOR − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).