Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Oct 26, 2013·Jobing.com Arena, Glendale

Edmonton Oilers 4, Phoenix Coyotes 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 69% of the time.

PHX winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
EDM11221117430
PHX0731229528

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:59EDMTyler PitlickUnassisted · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P2 0:47PHXMartin HanzalAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Shane Doan · Tip-in, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:20PHXMichael StoneUnassisted · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–2
  4. P2 5:47PHXDavid SchlemkoAssists: Tim Kennedy, Radim Vrbata · Slap, 0.01 xG1–3
  5. P2 8:03EDMWill ActonAssists: Ben Eager, Luke Gazdic · Wrist, 0.39 xG2–3
  6. P2 19:03EDMDavid PerronAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Justin Schultz · Wrist, 0.19 xG3–3
  7. P3 7:23EDMRyan JonesAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Nail Yakupov · Slap, 0.03 xG4–3
  8. P3 10:40PHXKeith YandlePPAssists: Oliver Ekman-Larsson, Radim Vrbata · Slap, 0.05 xG4–4
  9. P3 12:23PHXOliver Ekman-LarssonPPGWGAssists: Keith Yandle, Radim Vrbata · Slap, 0.03 xG4–5
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 3:34EDMRyan Jones: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 12:58EDMAles Hemsky: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P1 13:42PHXMartin Hanzal: Charging2 min
  4. P1 18:20PHXShane Doan: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 19:41EDMJeff Petry: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 9:50EDMAndrew Ference: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P3 11:21EDMMark Arcobello: High sticking2 min · PPG
  8. P3 14:34EDMLadislav Smid: Interference goalkeeper2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHX
48% to win52% to win
← EDM attackPHX attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gordon won the faceoff against Ribeiro
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMPHX
30Shots on goal28
2.2Expected goals1.3
46Shot attempts54
26Faceoffs won34
2Power plays6
12Penalty minutes4
28Hits26
14Blocked shots9
5Giveaways3
6Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestEager – Gazdic – Acton5:00

    xG 0.56–0.06 (90%)attempts 4–4goals 1–0

  2. Hemsky – Perron – Arcobello11:01

    xG 0.37–0.14 (73%)attempts 14–6goals 0–1

  3. Gordon – Jones – Pitlick5:17

    xG 0.14–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  4. Eberle – Nugent-Hopkins – Yakupov7:48

    xG 0.16–0.12 (58%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Belov12:56

    xG 1.09–0.13 (89%)attempts 13–8goals 2–1

  2. Ference – Grebeshkov11:51

    xG 0.39–0.16 (71%)attempts 14–7goals 1–1

  3. Smid – Petry14:29

    xG 0.21–0.34 (38%)attempts 9–10goals 1–1

Phoenix Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestRibeiro – Moss – Boedker12:03

    xG 0.32–0.12 (72%)attempts 11–5goals 0–1

  2. Doan – Vermette – Klinkhammer13:29

    xG 0.22–0.60 (27%)attempts 8–15goals 1–0

  3. Vrbata – Hanzal – Kennedy10:15

    xG 0.14–0.87 (14%)attempts 10–8goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. Michalek – Ekman-Larsson14:02

    xG 0.33–0.32 (50%)attempts 13–8goals 1–0

  2. Morris – Yandle16:29

    xG 0.17–0.42 (29%)attempts 5–12goals 0–1

  3. Schlemko – Stone10:48

    xG 0.28–1.06 (21%)attempts 12–14goals 2–3

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHX 1.3 xGEDM 2.2 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHXEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHX's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHX is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #44 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.39 · 9 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 20% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50PHX 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 69% of the time.

PHX winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (PHX − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).