Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Oct 27, 2013·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Tampa Bay Lightning 4, Florida Panthers 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 62% of the time.

FLA winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
TBL2818010022428
FLA11009210031332

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:41TBLMartin St. LouisAssists: Steven Stamkos, Ryan Malone · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 4:35TBLSteven StamkosAssists: Ryan Malone, Matt Carle · Slap, 0.10 xG2–0
  3. P1 13:48FLAShawn MatthiasAssists: Jesse Winchester, Marcel Goc · Backhand, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P2 9:58TBLRadko GudasPPAssists: Richard Panik, Alex Killorn · Snap, 0.03 xG3–1
  5. P3 5:39FLANick BjugstadAssists: Scottie Upshall, Dmitry Kulikov · Tip-in, 0.12 xG3–2
  6. P3 8:51FLABrad BoyesUnassisted · Backhand, 0.06 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. TBL Valtteri Filppula scored
  2. 2. FLA Jonathan Huberdeau stopped
  3. 3. TBL Victor Hedman stopped
  4. 4. FLA Aleksander Barkov stopped
  5. 5. TBL Sami Salo stopped
  6. 6. FLA Brad Boyes scored
  7. 7. TBL Steven Stamkos scored
  8. 8. FLA Dmitry Kulikov stopped
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 1:55TBLSami Salo: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 11:09TBLTeddy Purcell: Tripping2 min
  3. P1 19:18TBLRichard Panik: Boarding2 min
  4. P2 2:37FLABrian Campbell: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 5:07TBLMartin St. Louis: Holding2 min
  6. P2 9:12FLAJonathan Huberdeau: Too many men on the ice2 min · PPG
  7. P2 12:51TBLRadko Gudas: Misconduct10 min
  8. P2 12:51TBLRadko Gudas: Game misconduct10 min
  9. P2 12:51TBLRadko Gudas: Slashing2 min
  10. P2 12:51FLAScottie Upshall: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  11. P3 1:29FLATomas Kopecky: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
48% to win52% to win
← TBL attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thompson won the faceoff against Gomez
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLFLA
28Shots on goal32
1.9Expected goals2.5
49Shot attempts61
31Faceoffs won31
3Power plays4
30Penalty minutes8
25Hits23
15Blocked shots10
2Giveaways6
7Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestFilppula – Purcell – Killorn10:03

    xG 0.61–0.21 (74%)attempts 11–8goals 0–0

  2. St. Louis – Malone – Stamkos13:24

    xG 0.62–0.46 (58%)attempts 15–10goals 2–1

  3. Crombeen – Thompson – Labrie4:07

    xG 0.05–0.17 (24%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

  4. Johnson – Panik – Palat9:40

    xG 0.12–0.29 (30%)attempts 6–11goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrewer – Sustr8:24

    xG 0.52–0.30 (63%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  2. Carle – Gudas7:37

    xG 0.28–0.09 (76%)attempts 5–6goals 1–0

  3. Brewer – Hedman5:02

    xG 0.22–0.13 (62%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. Boyes – Huberdeau – Barkov8:45

    xG 0.19–0.23 (45%)attempts 5–5goals 1–0

  2. Gomez – Bergenheim – Winchester4:18

    xG 0.06–0.17 (25%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Upshall – Versteeg – Bjugstad9:04

    xG 0.31–0.44 (41%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  4. Kopecky – Goc – Matthias9:17

    xG 0.22–0.36 (38%)attempts 7–12goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCampbell – Kulikov12:26

    xG 0.68–0.50 (58%)attempts 16–12goals 2–0

  2. Gilroy – Gudbranson12:49

    xG 0.24–0.23 (50%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  3. Weaver – Gilbert12:58

    xG 0.14–0.63 (19%)attempts 10–14goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 2.5 xGTBL 1.9 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLATBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 73/100 · #265 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.77 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +28 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 62% of the time.

FLA winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).