Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Oct 27, 2013·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Edmonton Oilers 1, Los Angeles Kings 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 77% of the time.

LAK winsEDM wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
EDM051706001118
LAK010112023032248

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 4:12EDMNail YakupovPPAssists: Anton Belov, Jeff Petry · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–0
  2. P2 16:58LAKMike RichardsAssists: Jake Muzzin, Jeff Carter · Wrist, 0.20 xG1–1

Shootout

  1. 1. LAK Mike Richards scored
  2. 2. EDM Jordan Eberle scored
  3. 3. LAK Jeff Carter stopped
  4. 4. EDM David Perron stopped
  5. 5. LAK Anze Kopitar scored
  6. 6. EDM Ryan Nugent-Hopkins stopped
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 5:19EDMJustin Schultz: Holding2 min
  2. P1 10:15LAKJarret Stoll: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 12:15LAKDrew Doughty: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 14:49EDMDavid Perron: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 2:06EDMRyan Jones: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 2:06LAKKyle Clifford: Fighting5 min · PPG
  7. P2 2:09EDMLuke Gazdic: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 2:09LAKJordan Nolan: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 2:29LAKJake Muzzin: Interference2 min
  10. P2 5:08EDMNick Schultz: Hooking2 min
  11. P2 7:25EDMAnton Belov: Holding2 min
  12. P2 12:25LAKSlava Voynov: Tripping2 min
  13. OT 3:02EDMLuke Gazdic: Too many men on the ice2 min
  14. OT 4:24LAKJeff Carter: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

EDM00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
48% to win52% to win
← EDM attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Arcobello won the faceoff against Kopitar
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

EDMLAK
18Shots on goal48
1.7Expected goals3.3
32Shot attempts79
34Faceoffs won38
4Power plays5
20Penalty minutes20
30Hits33
18Blocked shots7
15Giveaways18
4Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. Eager – Gazdic – Acton2:30

    xG 0.01–0.12 (8%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  2. Eberle – Nugent-Hopkins – Yakupov9:20

    xG 0.29–0.46 (39%)attempts 5–11goals 0–1

  3. Gordon – Jones – Lander5:50

    xG 0.03–0.33 (7%)attempts 1–10goals 0–0

  4. Hemsky – Perron – Arcobello9:32

    xG 0.11–0.44 (20%)attempts 3–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Schultz – Belov13:59

    xG 0.22–0.52 (30%)attempts 6–14goals 0–1

  2. Smid – Petry11:00

    xG 0.10–0.45 (18%)attempts 4–14goals 0–0

  3. Ference – Schultz12:42

    xG 0.45–1.08 (29%)attempts 7–23goals 0–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestWilliams – Kopitar – King11:39

    xG 1.18–0.24 (83%)attempts 20–5goals 0–0

  2. Carter – Richards – Frattin10:24

    xG 0.59–0.28 (68%)attempts 14–3goals 1–0

  3. Fraser – Clifford – Nolan2:13

    xG 0.02–0.05 (28%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  4. Stoll – Brown – Lewis8:56

    xG 0.21–0.26 (45%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMitchell – Voynov15:45

    xG 0.95–0.44 (68%)attempts 23–10goals 0–0

  2. Regehr – Doughty15:25

    xG 0.74–0.28 (73%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  3. Greene – Muzzin9:24

    xG 0.60–0.19 (76%)attempts 17–2goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 3.3 xGEDM 1.7 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKEDM

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #915 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.12 · 2 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
EDM 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 77% of the time.

LAK winsEDM wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − EDM), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).