Skip to content
Ice Lab

Mon, Oct 28, 2013·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Washington Capitals 2, Vancouver Canucks 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 72% of the time.

VAN winsWSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
WSH190317219
VAN111016214341

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:31VANZack KassianAssists: Chris Higgins, Kevin Bieksa · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–1
  2. P1 14:36WSHJason ChimeraAssists: Mike Green, Nate Schmidt · Deflected, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P3 1:52WSHMikhail GrabovskiAssists: Jason Chimera, Joel Ward · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P3 2:53VANRyan KeslerAssists: Daniel Sedin, Ryan Stanton · Wrist, 0.31 xG2–2
  5. P3 5:01VANDaniel SedinGWGAssists: Henrik Sedin, Chris Tanev · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–3
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 1:19VANAlexander Edler: Penalty shot tripping on breakaway0 min
  2. P1 1:41VANRyan Stanton: Holding2 min
  3. P1 2:52WSHJoel Ward: Interference2 min
  4. P1 6:43WSHAaron Volpatti: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 8:52VANZack Kassian: Delaying game smothering puck2 min
  6. P2 3:22WSHMike Green: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  7. P2 5:03VANAlexander Edler: Interference2 min
  8. P2 12:45WSHTom Wilson: Cross checking2 min
  9. P3 6:28WSHSteve Oleksy: Slashing2 min
  10. P3 12:38VANKevin Bieksa: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 16:53WSHNicklas Backstrom: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

WSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
48% to win52% to win
← WSH attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Santorelli won the faceoff against Laich
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

WSHVAN
19Shots on goal41
2.2Expected goals3.4
42Shot attempts68
17Faceoffs won34
4Power plays6
12Penalty minutes8
18Hits15
12Blocked shots11
6Giveaways12
9Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestChimera – Ward – Grabovski9:10

    xG 0.71–0.35 (67%)attempts 9–10goals 2–0

  2. Fehr – Volpatti – Wilson4:21

    xG 0.04–0.07 (32%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  3. Erat – Laich – Brouwer8:13

    xG 0.05–0.12 (30%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

  4. Chimera – Fehr – Grabovski2:46

    xG 0.02–0.11 (15%)attempts 1–3goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGreen – Schmidt14:02

    xG 0.69–0.14 (83%)attempts 14–8goals 1–1

  2. Urbom – Oleksy9:46

    xG 0.19–0.11 (62%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

  3. Alzner – Carlson13:27

    xG 0.18–0.88 (17%)attempts 6–24goals 0–1

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Kesler11:07

    xG 0.74–0.18 (81%)attempts 18–5goals 2–0

  2. Richardson – Kassian – Welsh3:09

    xG 0.14–0.08 (64%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Richardson – Sestito – Kassian5:21

    xG 0.17–0.12 (59%)attempts 5–4goals 0–1

  4. Higgins – Burrows – Santorelli8:57

    xG 0.17–0.16 (52%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBieksa – Stanton10:54

    xG 0.54–0.12 (81%)attempts 13–6goals 1–1

  2. Edler – Garrison9:51

    xG 0.36–0.17 (68%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  3. Bieksa – Edler2:18

    xG 0.11–0.06 (65%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 3.4 xGWSH 2.2 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANWSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it WSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 50/100 · #548 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.64 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
WSH 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 72% of the time.

VAN winsWSH wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − WSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).