Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 2, 2013·SAP Center at San Jose, San Jose

Phoenix Coyotes 3, San Jose Sharks 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 88% of the time.

SJS winsPHX wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PHX171709072330
SJS016215019001250

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:36PHXAntoine VermetteAssists: Rob Klinkhammer, Mikkel Boedker · Snap, 0.08 xG1–0
  2. P2 1:16SJSJoe PavelskiAssists: Matt Nieto, Tommy Wingels · Snap, 0.09 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:10SJSDan BoylePPAssists: Joe Pavelski, Joe Thornton · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P2 8:57PHXMikkel BoedkerAssists: Derek Morris · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. SJS Logan Couture scored
  2. 2. PHX Mikkel Boedker stopped
  3. 3. SJS Joe Pavelski stopped
  4. 4. PHX Radim Vrbata scored
  5. 5. SJS Jason Demers stopped
  6. 6. PHX Mike Ribeiro stopped
  7. 7. SJS Tomas Hertl stopped
  8. 8. PHX David Rundblad stopped
  9. 9. SJS Patrick Marleau stopped
  10. 10. PHX Antoine Vermette scored
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 5:50PHXMartin Hanzal: Elbowing2 min
  2. P1 11:35SJSTommy Wingels: Interference2 min
  3. P1 14:39PHXRadim Vrbata: High sticking double minor4 min
  4. P2 3:49PHXKyle Chipchura: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P2 5:52SJSMarc-Edouard Vlasic: Cross checking2 min
  6. P2 15:00SJSTyler Kennedy: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 17:15PHXJordan Szwarz: Too many men on the ice2 min
  8. P3 0:41PHXZbynek Michalek: High sticking2 min
  9. P3 5:15SJSTyler Kennedy: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHX00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0SJS
48% to win52% to win
← PHX attackSJS attack →
  1. P1 20:00Thornton won the faceoff against Vermette
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHXSJS
30Shots on goal50
1.7Expected goals4.5
58Shot attempts87
31Faceoffs won31
4Power plays6
12Penalty minutes8
17Hits8
26Blocked shots20
5Giveaways14
10Takeaways17

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Phoenix Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestVermette – Klinkhammer – Boedker7:42

    xG 0.46–0.19 (71%)attempts 8–8goals 2–0

  2. Doan – Vrbata – Hanzal11:03

    xG 0.11–0.41 (21%)attempts 8–6goals 0–1

  3. Ribeiro – Moss – Korpikoski6:22

    xG 0.07–0.43 (14%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

  4. Chipchura – Szwarz – Miele2:32

    xG 0.02–0.39 (5%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Morris – Yandle12:09

    xG 0.24–0.45 (35%)attempts 17–9goals 0–1

  2. Michalek – Ekman-Larsson13:47

    xG 0.39–0.72 (35%)attempts 8–19goals 1–0

  3. Stone – Rundblad8:19

    xG 0.05–0.62 (7%)attempts 6–14goals 0–0

San Jose Sharks

Forward lines

  1. bestDesjardins – Sheppard – McCarthy4:35

    xG 0.30–0.01 (97%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

  2. Marleau – Havlat – Couture8:37

    xG 0.43–0.16 (73%)attempts 8–5goals 0–1

  3. Thornton – Kennedy – Hertl9:25

    xG 0.61–0.34 (64%)attempts 15–9goals 0–1

  4. Pavelski – Wingels – Nieto7:24

    xG 0.25–0.09 (73%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBoyle – Stuart11:00

    xG 0.68–0.16 (81%)attempts 16–10goals 0–1

  2. Hannan – Demers9:13

    xG 0.72–0.28 (72%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

  3. Hannan – Braun2:19

    xG 0.05–0.13 (27%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

SJS 4.5 xGPHX 1.7 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

SJSPHX

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

SJS's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line SJS is favoured, below it PHX. Dots are goals.

Excitement 50/100 · #559 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.61 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
PHX 100%5050%50SJS 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, San Jose Sharks win this game 88% of the time.

SJS winsPHX wins

Simulated goal difference (SJS − PHX), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).