Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 5, 2013·Jobing.com Arena, Glendale

Vancouver Canucks 2, Phoenix Coyotes 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Phoenix Coyotes win this game 64% of the time.

PHX winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
VAN06215010021233
PHX17111013012332

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:15PHXRadim VrbataAssists: Martin Hanzal · Tip-in, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P2 0:25VANDan HamhuisAssists: Mike Santorelli · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–1
  3. P2 4:15VANRyan KeslerPPAssists: Henrik Sedin, Daniel Sedin · Slap, 0.05 xG2–1
  4. P2 17:39PHXShane DoanAssists: Keith Yandle, David Moss · Slap, 0.03 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. PHX Mikkel Boedker stopped
  2. 2. VAN Mike Santorelli stopped
  3. 3. PHX Radim Vrbata scored
  4. 4. VAN Alexandre Burrows scored
  5. 5. PHX Mike Ribeiro stopped
  6. 6. VAN Chris Higgins stopped
  7. 7. PHX Oliver Ekman-Larsson stopped
  8. 8. VAN Daniel Sedin stopped
  9. 9. PHX Shane Doan stopped
  10. 10. VAN Ryan Kesler stopped
  11. 11. PHX Antoine Vermette scored
  12. 12. VAN Henrik Sedin stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 2:21VANHenrik Sedin: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 5:25VANRyan Kesler: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 3:48PHXAntoine Vermette: Roughing2 min · PPG
  4. P2 7:31VANZack Kassian: Boarding2 min
  5. P2 19:03PHXJordan Szwarz: Too many men on the ice2 min
  6. P3 10:43PHXMartin Hanzal: Hooking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHX
48% to win52% to win
← VAN attackPHX attack →
  1. P1 20:00Vermette won the faceoff against Sedin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANPHX
33Shots on goal32
1.7Expected goals2.4
66Shot attempts64
39Faceoffs won30
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
25Hits44
16Blocked shots18
0Giveaways1
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestHiggins – Burrows – Santorelli11:11

    xG 0.63–0.40 (61%)attempts 16–10goals 1–1

  2. Richardson – Kassian – Archibald7:48

    xG 0.07–0.08 (47%)attempts 5–9goals 0–0

  3. Sedin – Sedin – Kesler14:29

    xG 0.24–0.32 (43%)attempts 15–11goals 0–0

  4. Sestito – Dalpe – Welsh3:41

    xG 0.03–0.14 (18%)attempts 1–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdler – Garrison14:19

    xG 0.68–0.35 (66%)attempts 20–13goals 0–0

  2. Bieksa – Stanton12:17

    xG 0.17–0.13 (56%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  3. Garrison – Stanton3:27

    xG 0.04–0.01 (73%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Phoenix Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestDoan – Vrbata – Hanzal5:26

    xG 0.38–0.12 (76%)attempts 9–7goals 1–1

  2. Doan – Ribeiro – Moss5:22

    xG 0.23–0.03 (88%)attempts 9–4goals 1–0

  3. Vermette – Klinkhammer – Boedker12:47

    xG 0.21–0.13 (62%)attempts 11–13goals 0–0

  4. Ribeiro – Moss – Korpikoski5:01

    xG 0.04–0.02 (71%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMichalek – Yandle7:55

    xG 0.29–0.07 (80%)attempts 14–4goals 0–1

  2. Stone – Ekman-Larsson8:49

    xG 0.26–0.06 (81%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  3. Klesla – Yandle4:35

    xG 0.16–0.04 (80%)attempts 6–3goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHX 2.4 xGVAN 1.7 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHXVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHX's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHX is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 49/100 · #567 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.59 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50PHX 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +22 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Phoenix Coyotes win this game 64% of the time.

PHX winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (PHX − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).