Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 7, 2013·Verizon Center, Washington

Minnesota Wild 2, Washington Capitals 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 58% of the time.

WSH winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
MIN112110010030235
WSH1509111021327

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 8:10WSHAlex OvechkinPPAssists: Nicklas Backstrom, Marcus Johansson · Slap, 0.12 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:51MINCharlie CoylePPAssists: Zach Parise, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:07MINMikael GranlundAssists: Jason Pominville, Nino Niederreiter · Wrist, 0.23 xG2–1
  4. P3 16:52WSHMarcus JohanssonAssists: Tom Wilson, Brooks Laich · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. WSH Mikhail Grabovski stopped
  2. 2. MIN Jason Pominville stopped
  3. 3. WSH Alex Ovechkin stopped
  4. 4. MIN Mikko Koivu stopped
  5. 5. WSH Nicklas Backstrom scored
  6. 6. MIN Charlie Coyle stopped
Penalties (6)
  1. P1 2:39WSHAaron Volpatti: Boarding2 min
  2. P1 7:51MINNate Prosser: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 9:51MINJustin Fontaine: Tripping2 min
  4. P1 17:31WSHMike Green: Hooking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 12:53MINMatt Cooke: Slashing2 min
  6. P3 19:02WSHMartin Erat: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WSH
48% to win52% to win
← MIN attackWSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Koivu won the faceoff against Johansson
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINWSH
35Shots on goal27
2.9Expected goals2.4
51Shot attempts57
34Faceoffs won25
3Power plays3
6Penalty minutes6
14Hits23
15Blocked shots10
1Giveaways9
10Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestPominville – Granlund – Niederreiter10:14

    xG 0.75–0.22 (77%)attempts 9–8goals 1–0

  2. Heatley – Pominville – Granlund2:23

    xG 0.22–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–0goals 0–0

  3. Heatley – Konopka – Mitchell6:08

    xG 0.12–0.02 (87%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

  4. Koivu – Pominville – Parise2:20

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Brodin19:01

    xG 0.55–0.12 (83%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  2. Scandella – Spurgeon11:36

    xG 0.75–0.32 (70%)attempts 9–9goals 1–0

  3. Suter – Spurgeon4:03

    xG 0.37–0.02 (96%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

Washington Capitals

Forward lines

  1. bestLatta – Volpatti – Wilson4:19

    xG 0.18–0.12 (60%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Erat – Ovechkin – Backstrom13:34

    xG 0.44–0.45 (50%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  3. Laich – Brouwer – Johansson11:47

    xG 0.22–0.45 (32%)attempts 13–6goals 0–0

  4. Chimera – Ward – Grabovski13:10

    xG 0.25–0.80 (24%)attempts 11–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Urbom – Oleksy10:49

    xG 0.33–0.49 (40%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  2. Green – Schmidt18:59

    xG 0.26–0.51 (34%)attempts 12–9goals 0–0

  3. Alzner – Carlson16:49

    xG 0.35–1.21 (22%)attempts 18–16goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WSH 2.4 xGMIN 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WSHMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WSH is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 77/100 · #228 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.08 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 10% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50WSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +38 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 58% of the time.

WSH winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (WSH − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).