Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Nov 8, 2013·MTS Centre, Winnipeg

Nashville Predators 0, Winnipeg Jets 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 67% of the time.

WPG winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH09015017041
WPG41301019532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:04WPGBryan LittleGWGAssists: Andrew Ladd, Blake Wheeler · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:47WPGOlli JokinenAssists: Evander Kane, Keaton Ellerby · Deflected, 0.23 xG0–2
  3. P1 8:23WPGEric TangradiAssists: Dustin Byfuglien, Grant Clitsome · Slap, 0.20 xG0–3
  4. P1 16:45WPGDevin SetoguchiAssists: Olli Jokinen · Snap, 0.26 xG0–4
  5. P3 9:53WPGBryan LittleAssists: Andrew Ladd, Blake Wheeler · Snap, 0.22 xG0–5
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 18:44WPGAdam Pardy: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 18:44NSHRich Clune: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 0:48WPGAdam Pardy: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 0:48NSHRich Clune: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 3:37NSHTaylor Beck: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 5:55NSHPatric Hornqvist: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 11:32WPGZach Bogosian: Holding2 min
  8. P2 19:20WPGDustin Byfuglien: Interference2 min
  9. P2 0:00NSHDavid Legwand: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 0:00WPGZach Bogosian: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 11:45WPGEric Tangradi: High sticking2 min
  12. P3 12:50NSHPatric Hornqvist: Interference2 min
  13. P3 15:27WPGDustin Byfuglien: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0WPG
48% to win52% to win
← NSH attackWPG attack →
  1. P1 20:00Gaustad won the faceoff against Scheifele
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHWPG
41Shots on goal32
4.3Expected goals3.2
71Shot attempts62
35Faceoffs won26
4Power plays3
15Penalty minutes17
26Hits23
13Blocked shots17
5Giveaways13
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestLegwand – Hornqvist – Bourque3:19

    xG 0.52–0.03 (94%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Stalberg – Spaling – Wilson6:40

    xG 0.58–0.26 (69%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  3. Legwand – Nystrom – Hornqvist6:04

    xG 0.19–0.12 (62%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

  4. Gaustad – Clune – Beck4:50

    xG 0.09–0.05 (64%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKlein – Josi10:54

    xG 1.14–0.37 (76%)attempts 19–8goals 0–1

  2. Weber – Ekholm9:59

    xG 0.82–0.39 (67%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

  3. Ellis – Jones7:50

    xG 0.72–0.39 (65%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

Winnipeg Jets

Forward lines

  1. bestJokinen – Setoguchi – Kane9:00

    xG 1.27–0.33 (80%)attempts 14–9goals 2–0

  2. Ladd – Wheeler – Little8:43

    xG 0.74–0.47 (61%)attempts 13–10goals 2–0

  3. Thorburn – Tangradi – Wright6:47

    xG 0.38–0.14 (73%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  4. Frolik – Halischuk – Scheifele11:14

    xG 0.33–1.74 (16%)attempts 15–19goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEnstrom – Bogosian13:06

    xG 1.32–0.74 (64%)attempts 15–15goals 2–0

  2. Pardy – Ellerby10:35

    xG 0.78–0.30 (72%)attempts 14–10goals 2–0

  3. Byfuglien – Clitsome14:34

    xG 0.64–0.74 (46%)attempts 17–16goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

WPG 3.2 xGNSH 4.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

WPGNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

WPG's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line WPG is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 3/100 · #1182 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.48 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50WPG 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 67% of the time.

WPG winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (WPG − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).