Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 13, 2013·Xcel Energy Center, St. Paul

Toronto Maple Leafs 1, Minnesota Wild 2 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 59% of the time.

MIN winsTOR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
TOR071607030123
MIN06014114002234

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 7:32TORMason RaymondPPAssists: Morgan Rielly, Nazem Kadri · Wrist, 0.44 xG1–0
  2. P3 15:43MINZach PariseAssists: Charlie Coyle, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.27 xG1–1

Shootout

  1. 1. MIN Zach Parise scored
  2. 2. TOR Mason Raymond stopped
  3. 3. MIN Mikko Koivu stopped
  4. 4. TOR Phil Kessel stopped
  5. 5. MIN Jason Pominville scored
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 7:07TORNazem Kadri: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 13:53TORJoffrey Lupul: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 13:53MINCharlie Coyle: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 17:57MINMikael Granlund: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 1:06TORNazem Kadri: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 5:52MINCharlie Coyle: Hooking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 13:18MINZach Parise: Holding2 min
  8. P2 18:05TORMark Fraser: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 18:05MINKyle Brodziak: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 0:34TORJay McClement: Tripping2 min
  11. P3 3:57TORJerred Smithson: Interference2 min
  12. P3 8:41TORNazem Kadri: Match penatly 10 minutes10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TOR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0MIN
48% to win52% to win
← TOR attackMIN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kadri won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TORMIN
23Shots on goal34
2.6Expected goals3.2
43Shot attempts70
32Faceoffs won29
3Power plays5
25Penalty minutes13
33Hits13
18Blocked shots12
8Giveaways5
8Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Toronto Maple Leafs

Forward lines

  1. Smithson – McClement – Kulemin5:07

    xG 0.00–0.25 (0%)attempts 1–9goals 0–0

  2. Lupul – Clarkson – Kadri6:21

    xG 0.13–0.39 (26%)attempts 3–10goals 0–0

  3. Raymond – Kessel – van Riemsdyk6:56

    xG 0.40–0.70 (37%)attempts 7–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestRanger – Fraser5:23

    xG 0.36–0.29 (55%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  2. Franson – Rielly2:57

    xG 0.01–0.05 (18%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Ranger – Rielly2:06

    xG 0.12–0.27 (31%)attempts 1–1goals 0–1

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Parise – Coyle9:26

    xG 0.80–0.03 (96%)attempts 17–2goals 1–0

  2. Pominville – Granlund – Niederreiter6:46

    xG 0.32–0.04 (89%)attempts 12–3goals 0–0

  3. Heatley – Konopka – Mitchell3:08

    xG 0.00–0.10 (0%)attempts 0–3goals 0–0

  4. Cooke – Brodziak – Fontaine9:30

    xG 0.29–0.57 (33%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Brodin15:11

    xG 0.98–0.06 (94%)attempts 22–3goals 1–0

  2. Scandella – Spurgeon8:20

    xG 0.45–0.23 (66%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  3. Stoner – Prosser8:07

    xG 0.32–0.34 (48%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

MIN 3.2 xGTOR 2.6 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

MINTOR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

MIN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line MIN is favoured, below it TOR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 46/100 · #610 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.47 · 2 goals in reachComeback index 12% (winner's lowest chance)
TOR 100%5050%50MIN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +36 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Minnesota Wild win this game 59% of the time.

MIN winsTOR wins

Simulated goal difference (MIN − TOR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).