Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 14, 2013·United Center, Chicago

Phoenix Coyotes 4, Chicago Blackhawks 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 76% of the time.

CHI winsPHX wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PHX21321106001430
CHI29123117032552

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:37CHIBrandon SaadAssists: Patrick Kane, Nick Leddy · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:22CHIPatrick SharpPPAssists: Jonathan Toews, Patrick Kane · Wrist, 0.11 xG0–2
  3. P1 7:03PHXMichael StoneAssists: Mikkel Boedker, Rob Klinkhammer · Wrist, 0.01 xG1–2
  4. P1 14:04PHXShane DoanPPAssists: Keith Yandle, Mike Ribeiro · Wrist, 0.14 xG2–2
  5. P2 5:05CHIMarian HossaAssists: Jonathan Toews, Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–3
  6. P2 14:55PHXLauri KorpikoskiAssists: Radim Vrbata, Keith Yandle · Wrist, 0.33 xG3–3
  7. P2 17:06PHXMichael StoneAssists: Shane Doan, Oliver Ekman-Larsson · Wrist, 0.02 xG4–3
  8. P3 3:00CHIBrandon PirriAssists: Brent Seabrook, Nick Leddy · Tip-in, 0.13 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. CHI Jonathan Toews scored
  2. 2. PHX Antoine Vermette stopped
  3. 3. CHI Patrick Sharp stopped
  4. 4. PHX Radim Vrbata scored
  5. 5. CHI Patrick Kane stopped
  6. 6. PHX Mikkel Boedker stopped
  7. 7. CHI Brandon Pirri scored
  8. 8. PHX Mike Ribeiro stopped
Penalties (8)
  1. P1 6:06PHXMichael Stone: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 13:50CHIMarian Hossa: Holding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 14:14CHIBrandon Bollig: Holding2 min
  4. P1 14:14CHIBrandon Bollig: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P2 6:48PHXMartin Hanzal: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 0:56PHXOliver Ekman-Larsson: Holding the stick2 min
  7. P3 4:39CHIAndrew Shaw: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  8. P3 4:39PHXMike Smith: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHX00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
48% to win52% to win
← PHX attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Pirri won the faceoff against Vermette
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHXCHI
30Shots on goal52
2.6Expected goals4.3
55Shot attempts79
32Faceoffs won38
3Power plays3
8Penalty minutes8
39Hits22
19Blocked shots13
6Giveaways9
7Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Phoenix Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestVrbata – Korpikoski – Hanzal10:05

    xG 0.86–0.22 (79%)attempts 10–7goals 1–0

  2. Doan – Ribeiro – Moss10:34

    xG 0.35–0.54 (39%)attempts 13–11goals 1–1

  3. Halpern – Chipchura – Szwarz5:21

    xG 0.04–0.44 (7%)attempts 4–8goals 0–1

  4. Vermette – Klinkhammer – Boedker12:44

    xG 0.45–1.15 (28%)attempts 13–14goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestYandle – Schlemko5:31

    xG 0.72–0.42 (63%)attempts 7–7goals 1–0

  2. Michalek – Ekman-Larsson3:47

    xG 0.27–0.04 (87%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  3. Klesla – Ekman-Larsson4:27

    xG 0.01–0.05 (18%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestHossa – Sharp – Toews13:13

    xG 1.17–0.29 (80%)attempts 20–9goals 1–0

  2. Kane – Shaw – Saad2:17

    xG 0.55–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  3. Bickell – Morin – Shaw5:42

    xG 0.54–0.02 (96%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  4. Bickell – Kane – Shaw3:34

    xG 0.19–0.04 (84%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Seabrook18:12

    xG 1.47–0.32 (82%)attempts 25–13goals 1–0

  2. Brookbank – Leddy11:10

    xG 1.11–0.48 (70%)attempts 15–14goals 1–2

  3. Oduya – Hjalmarsson16:01

    xG 0.65–0.92 (41%)attempts 16–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 4.3 xGPHX 2.6 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIPHX

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it PHX. Dots are goals.

Excitement 92/100 · #78 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.23 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 25% (winner's lowest chance)
PHX 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +25 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 76% of the time.

CHI winsPHX wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − PHX), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).