Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Nov 16, 2013·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Chicago Blackhawks 2, Nashville Predators 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 56% of the time.

NSH winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI07118116241
NSH21021337730

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 7:28NSHMatt CullenAssists: Craig Smith, Seth Jones · Wrist, 0.29 xG0–1
  2. P1 8:25NSHNick SpalingAssists: Craig Smith, Ryan Ellis · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P2 9:02NSHPatric HornqvistPPGWGAssists: Roman Josi, Shea Weber · Tip-in, 0.16 xG0–3
  4. P2 18:18NSHCraig SmithAssists: Matt Cullen · Backhand, 0.14 xG0–4
  5. P2 18:44CHIPatrick KaneAssists: Brandon Bollig, Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.07 xG1–4
  6. P3 6:14CHIBrandon PirriAssists: Brent Seabrook, Kris Versteeg · Wrist, 0.40 xG2–4
  7. P3 6:29NSHViktor StalbergAssists: Gabriel Bourque, David Legwand · Backhand, 0.12 xG2–5
  8. P3 12:19NSHMike FisherAssists: Patric Hornqvist · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–6
  9. P3 14:07NSHShea WeberPPAssists: Roman Josi, David Legwand · Slap, 0.04 xG2–7
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 2:06CHISheldon Brookbank: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 2:06NSHRich Clune: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 2:06CHISheldon Brookbank: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 12:17NSHCraig Smith: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 13:42CHIBrandon Pirri: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 6:14CHIKris Versteeg: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 8:05CHIBrandon Bollig: Delaying game puck over glass2 min · PPG
  8. P2 10:24NSHShea Weber: Interference2 min
  9. P2 14:54NSHVictor Bartley: High sticking2 min
  10. P3 4:10NSHDavid Legwand: High sticking2 min
  11. P3 13:44CHIBryan Bickell: Tripping2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
48% to win52% to win
← CHI attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Fisher
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHINSH
41Shots on goal30
2.8Expected goals2.5
76Shot attempts44
24Faceoffs won43
4Power plays5
15Penalty minutes13
12Hits20
7Blocked shots16
8Giveaways10
9Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBickell – Versteeg – Shaw8:14

    xG 0.44–0.09 (82%)attempts 12–3goals 0–1

  2. Kane – Pirri – Bollig5:04

    xG 0.36–0.14 (72%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  3. Sharp – Toews – Saad6:01

    xG 0.37–0.27 (58%)attempts 10–6goals 0–0

  4. Sharp – Toews – Kane3:42

    xG 0.10–0.09 (53%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOduya – Hjalmarsson10:21

    xG 0.70–0.31 (69%)attempts 18–6goals 0–1

  2. Rozsival – Leddy14:57

    xG 0.76–0.73 (51%)attempts 19–11goals 0–1

  3. Keith – Seabrook10:20

    xG 0.13–0.54 (20%)attempts 11–10goals 1–2

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestLegwand – Stalberg – Bourque10:15

    xG 0.62–0.37 (63%)attempts 9–14goals 1–0

  2. Hendricks – Gaustad – Clune6:54

    xG 0.06–0.07 (48%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Cullen – Spaling – Smith10:37

    xG 0.30–0.32 (48%)attempts 6–11goals 2–1

  4. Fisher – Hornqvist – Wilson8:48

    xG 0.31–0.57 (35%)attempts 9–16goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. Weber – Josi14:00

    xG 0.46–0.51 (48%)attempts 13–18goals 0–0

  2. Klein – Bartley2:10

    xG 0.00–0.14 (0%)attempts 0–5goals 0–0

  3. Bartley – Ellis12:39

    xG 0.49–0.67 (42%)attempts 11–14goals 3–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 2.5 xGCHI 2.8 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #413 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.67 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 56% of the time.

NSH winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).