Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Nov 19, 2013·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

Tampa Bay Lightning 2, Los Angeles Kings 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 72% of the time.

LAK winsTBL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
TBL0712112221
LAK210311010531

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 14:58LAKAnze KopitarAssists: Drew Doughty, Justin Williams · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P1 16:49LAKMatt FrattinPPAssists: Slava Voynov, Jarret Stoll · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–2
  3. P2 2:38LAKJustin WilliamsGWGAssists: Drew Doughty, Anze Kopitar · Backhand, 0.11 xG0–3
  4. P2 15:08LAKDwight KingSHAssists: Linden Vey · Deflected, 0.11 xG0–4
  5. P2 16:17TBLValtteri FilppulaPPAssists: Victor Hedman, Martin St. Louis · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–4
  6. P2 17:15LAKDustin BrownAssists: Matt Frattin · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–5
  7. P3 1:22TBLVictor HedmanAssists: Tyler Johnson · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–5
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 3:10TBLRadko Gudas: Holding2 min
  2. P1 15:11TBLAlex Killorn: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P1 17:26LAKJustin Williams: High sticking2 min
  4. P2 0:38TBLBrett Connolly: Interference2 min
  5. P2 3:50TBLPierre-Cedric Labrie: High sticking double minor4 min
  6. P2 13:46LAKJake Muzzin: High sticking double minor4 min · PPG
  7. P3 15:43LAKDaniel Carcillo: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

TBL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
48% to win52% to win
← TBL attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Connolly won the faceoff against Kopitar
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

TBLLAK
21Shots on goal31
1.7Expected goals2.9
36Shot attempts57
24Faceoffs won40
4Power plays5
10Penalty minutes8
22Hits37
8Blocked shots4
15Giveaways3
1Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestKillorn – Connolly – Brown5:19

    xG 0.29–0.13 (70%)attempts 4–4goals 0–1

  2. Filppula – Purcell – Brown3:50

    xG 0.01–0.02 (42%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. St. Louis – Killorn – Connolly2:58

    xG 0.15–0.20 (42%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  4. Johnson – Panik – Palat9:47

    xG 0.41–0.53 (43%)attempts 7–8goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSalo – Carle6:23

    xG 0.59–0.14 (81%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  2. Salo – Korobov3:30

    xG 0.18–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  3. Carle – Gudas7:37

    xG 0.06–0.39 (13%)attempts 2–9goals 0–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. bestRichards – King – Toffoli6:34

    xG 0.50–0.23 (69%)attempts 8–7goals 0–0

  2. Lewis – Vey – Pearson6:49

    xG 0.25–0.15 (62%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. Williams – Brown – Kopitar9:22

    xG 0.10–0.22 (31%)attempts 7–5goals 1–0

  4. Stoll – Carcillo – Frattin8:54

    xG 0.13–0.65 (17%)attempts 6–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMuzzin – Doughty13:43

    xG 1.03–0.27 (79%)attempts 20–8goals 1–0

  2. Regehr – Voynov12:20

    xG 0.46–0.39 (54%)attempts 13–8goals 0–0

  3. Mitchell – Martinez12:46

    xG 0.15–0.65 (18%)attempts 3–11goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 2.9 xGTBL 1.7 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKTBL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it TBL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #901 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.63 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
TBL 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 72% of the time.

LAK winsTBL wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − TBL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).