Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 20, 2013·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Minnesota Wild 4, Ottawa Senators 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 64% of the time.

OTT winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN1621019425
OTT21801217337

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:54OTTKyle TurrisSHAssists: Clarke MacArthur · Wrist, 0.21 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:53MINJason PominvillePPAssists: Zach Parise, Mikko Koivu · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P1 11:11OTTMika ZibanejadAssists: Derek Grant, Erik Condra · Backhand, 0.33 xG1–2
  4. P2 3:00MINJonas BrodinAssists: Dany Heatley, Justin Fontaine · Wrist, 0.01 xG2–2
  5. P2 6:15MINDany HeatleyAssists: Mikko Koivu, Jonas Brodin · Wrist, 0.21 xG3–2
  6. P3 8:57OTTMilan MichalekPPAssists: Mika Zibanejad, Erik Karlsson · Slap, 0.21 xG3–3
  7. P3 17:03MINMikko KoivuGWGAssists: Zach Parise, Charlie Coyle · Wrist, 0.07 xG4–3
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 5:36OTTJared Cowen: Interference2 min · PPG
  2. P2 3:46MINKyle Brodziak: Roughing2 min
  3. P2 3:46OTTMark Borowiecki: Roughing2 min
  4. P2 6:23MINClayton Stoner: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 6:23OTTChris Neil: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 7:06OTTMark Borowiecki: Boarding2 min
  7. P2 18:36OTTDerek Grant: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 3:11MINDany Heatley: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 8:39MINJason Pominville: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
48% to win52% to win
← MIN attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Turris won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINOTT
25Shots on goal37
2.1Expected goals2.9
42Shot attempts66
26Faceoffs won35
3Power plays2
11Penalty minutes13
24Hits44
21Blocked shots6
5Giveaways14
8Takeaways11

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Parise – Coyle13:39

    xG 0.46–0.18 (72%)attempts 15–11goals 1–0

  2. Cooke – Brodziak – Niederreiter11:49

    xG 0.19–0.43 (31%)attempts 7–13goals 0–0

  3. Pominville – Zucker – Granlund9:14

    xG 0.16–0.46 (26%)attempts 3–12goals 0–0

  4. Heatley – Konopka – Fontaine3:48

    xG 0.08–0.90 (9%)attempts 3–9goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSuter – Brodin19:59

    xG 0.72–0.40 (64%)attempts 13–18goals 2–0

  2. Scandella – Spurgeon13:55

    xG 0.30–0.51 (37%)attempts 10–19goals 1–0

  3. Stoner – Dumba7:43

    xG 0.18–1.16 (13%)attempts 5–14goals 0–1

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestNeil – Condra – Grant2:52

    xG 0.20–0.05 (79%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Smith – Conacher – Zibanejad7:38

    xG 0.27–0.19 (59%)attempts 9–6goals 0–0

  3. Spezza – Michalek – Greening11:57

    xG 0.32–0.26 (55%)attempts 16–8goals 0–1

  4. Neil – Smith – Conacher5:04

    xG 0.05–0.15 (27%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWiercioch – Cowen14:52

    xG 1.09–0.24 (82%)attempts 23–7goals 1–0

  2. Methot – Karlsson15:37

    xG 0.55–0.40 (58%)attempts 17–13goals 0–1

  3. Karlsson – Cowen2:09

    xG 0.00–0.00attempts 1–1goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 2.9 xGMIN 2.1 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 74/100 · #253 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.96 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 27% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Ottawa Senators win this game 64% of the time.

OTT winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).