Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Nov 21, 2013·Rexall Place, Edmonton

Florida Panthers 1, Edmonton Oilers 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 61% of the time.

EDM winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA0611306125
EDM11221518435

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:57EDMJordan EberlePPAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Taylor Hall · Snap, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P2 6:10EDMSam GagnerGWGAssists: Nail Yakupov, Corey Potter · Wrist, 0.05 xG0–2
  3. P2 10:54EDMDavid PerronPPAssists: Justin Schultz, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Slap, 0.05 xG0–3
  4. P2 16:34FLAScottie UpshallAssists: Aleksander Barkov, Brad Boyes · Snap, 0.28 xG1–3
  5. P3 18:49EDMJordan EberleENAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Taylor Hall · Wrist, 0.62 xG1–4
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 0:28FLATom Gilbert: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 6:31EDMBoyd Gordon: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 9:43FLAJimmy Hayes: Cross checking2 min
  4. P2 6:41EDMNail Yakupov: Roughing2 min
  5. P2 7:31FLABrad Boyes: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 9:33FLAScottie Upshall: Slashing2 min · PPG
  7. P3 1:23FLABrian Campbell: Slashing2 min
  8. P3 2:19EDMRyan Nugent-Hopkins: Too many men on the ice2 min
  9. P3 4:25FLAScottie Upshall: Fighting5 min
  10. P3 4:25EDMAndrew Ference: Fighting5 min
  11. P3 4:25EDMAndrew Ference: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 6:57EDMNick Schultz: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
48% to win52% to win
← FLA attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Goc won the faceoff against Gagner
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLAEDM
25Shots on goal35
2.3Expected goals2.9
57Shot attempts52
24Faceoffs won28
5Power plays5
15Penalty minutes15
16Hits21
8Blocked shots16
5Giveaways14
2Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestBoyes – Upshall – Barkov9:51

    xG 0.58–0.28 (67%)attempts 8–7goals 1–0

  2. Upshall – Matthias – Hayes3:11

    xG 0.20–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  3. Barch – Matthias – Hayes2:42

    xG 0.08–0.15 (34%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  4. Fleischmann – Bjugstad – Huberdeau6:41

    xG 0.07–0.27 (22%)attempts 5–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestMottau – Gilroy8:09

    xG 0.40–0.25 (62%)attempts 4–9goals 1–1

  2. Campbell – Gilbert14:33

    xG 0.79–0.84 (48%)attempts 21–17goals 0–0

  3. Kulikov – Gudbranson13:29

    xG 0.31–0.58 (35%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestSmyth – Gordon – Perron11:09

    xG 0.83–0.10 (89%)attempts 18–5goals 0–0

  2. Joensuu – Gazdic – Acton4:34

    xG 0.11–0.19 (37%)attempts 3–7goals 0–0

  3. Eberle – Hall – Nugent-Hopkins9:47

    xG 0.33–0.50 (40%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  4. Hemsky – Gagner – Yakupov10:40

    xG 0.32–0.58 (36%)attempts 7–10goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchultz – Belov12:53

    xG 0.46–0.32 (59%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  2. Ference – Petry13:47

    xG 0.48–0.37 (57%)attempts 12–13goals 0–0

  3. Schultz – Potter10:55

    xG 0.35–0.59 (37%)attempts 5–13goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 2.9 xGFLA 2.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 24/100 · #885 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.69 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 61% of the time.

EDM winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).