Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Nov 27, 2013·Pepsi Center, Denver

St. Louis Blues 4, Colorado Avalanche 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 72% of the time.

COL winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL31301319435
COL1110609126

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:46STLDavid BackesAssists: T.J. Oshie, Jay Bouwmeester · Wrist, 0.17 xG1–0
  2. P1 6:10STLAlexander SteenPPGWGAssists: David Backes, Derek Roy · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–0
  3. P1 8:24COLPatrick BordeleauAssists: Jan Hejda, Brad Malone · Backhand, 0.30 xG2–1
  4. P1 18:12STLJaden SchwartzSHUnassisted · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–1
  5. P3 18:16STLChris StewartENAssists: Derek Roy, Patrik Berglund · Wrist, 0.65 xG4–1
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 5:34COLJan Hejda: Tripping2 min · PPG
  2. P1 10:28STLJay Bouwmeester: Holding2 min
  3. P1 17:21STLIan Cole: Holding2 min
  4. P2 10:21STLJay Bouwmeester: Interference2 min
  5. P2 12:49STLDavid Backes: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 12:49COLTyson Barrie: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 14:54STLJaden Schwartz: Concealing puck2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
48% to win52% to win
← STL attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backes won the faceoff against Mitchell
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLCOL
35Shots on goal26
3.3Expected goals2.0
55Shot attempts56
24Faceoffs won26
1Power plays4
10Penalty minutes4
23Hits35
22Blocked shots11
0Giveaways6
12Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestSteen – Backes – Oshie10:38

    xG 0.46–0.10 (82%)attempts 11–8goals 1–0

  2. Sobotka – Tarasenko – Schwartz11:52

    xG 0.45–0.16 (73%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  3. Roy – Stewart – Berglund7:22

    xG 0.39–0.27 (59%)attempts 8–9goals 0–0

  4. Morrow – Lapierre – Paajarvi7:20

    xG 0.35–0.44 (44%)attempts 9–6goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestJackman – Shattenkirk13:50

    xG 0.80–0.51 (61%)attempts 15–9goals 0–1

  2. Bouwmeester – Pietrangelo15:18

    xG 0.46–0.31 (60%)attempts 14–14goals 1–0

  3. Polak – Cole13:21

    xG 0.41–0.49 (46%)attempts 13–13goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestParenteau – O'Reilly – Duchene4:48

    xG 0.16–0.07 (70%)attempts 6–4goals 0–0

  2. Talbot – Mitchell – McLeod9:10

    xG 0.21–0.13 (62%)attempts 10–7goals 0–0

  3. Bordeleau – Cliche – Malone4:18

    xG 0.06–0.17 (24%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Talbot – Mitchell – Bordeleau3:27

    xG 0.02–0.16 (12%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSarich – Benoit8:33

    xG 0.56–0.23 (71%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  2. Sarich – Guenin4:24

    xG 0.05–0.02 (71%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  3. Benoit – Barrie2:17

    xG 0.01–0.14 (7%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.0 xGSTL 3.3 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 26/100 · #851 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.85 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 72% of the time.

COL winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).