Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 3, 2013·Nassau Veterans Memorial Coliseum, Uniondale

Pittsburgh Penguins 3, New York Islanders 2 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 71% of the time.

NYI winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
PIT0101811214334
NYI29080600223

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:53NYIKyle OkposoAssists: John Tavares, Thomas Vanek · Deflected, 0.16 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:55NYIKyle OkposoAssists: John Tavares, Andrew MacDonald · Slap, 0.05 xG0–2
  3. P2 19:44PITJames NealPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin, Chris Kunitz · Snap, 0.19 xG1–2
  4. P3 8:00PITSidney CrosbyPPAssists: Evgeni Malkin · Snap, 0.14 xG2–2
  5. OT 3:44PITSidney CrosbyGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.27 xG3–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 18:05NYIThomas Vanek: Holding the stick2 min
  2. P1 19:22NYIAaron Ness: High sticking2 min
  3. P2 14:49PITJames Neal: Elbowing2 min
  4. P2 19:15NYIJohn Tavares: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  5. P3 6:42NYIAaron Ness: High sticking2 min · PPG
  6. P3 8:37NYIMatt Martin: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 8:37PITBrooks Orpik: Holding the stick2 min
  8. P3 13:16NYICal Clutterbuck: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 13:16PITEvgeni Malkin: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 18:13PITEvgeni Malkin: Cross checking2 min
  11. P3 19:36NYIThomas Vanek: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NYI
48% to win52% to win
← PIT attackNYI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Tavares
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITNYI
34Shots on goal23
4.8Expected goals3.3
79Shot attempts49
27Faceoffs won32
5Power plays2
8Penalty minutes14
26Hits20
12Blocked shots15
18Giveaways13
8Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestJokinen – Malkin – Neal9:14

    xG 0.93–0.17 (85%)attempts 13–4goals 0–0

  2. Malkin – Crosby – Neal3:27

    xG 0.44–0.27 (62%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. Adams – Vitale – Sill5:08

    xG 0.22–0.22 (50%)attempts 4–3goals 0–0

  4. Dupuis – Kunitz – Crosby7:56

    xG 0.25–0.37 (41%)attempts 8–8goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestNiskanen – Despres15:16

    xG 1.15–0.65 (64%)attempts 18–12goals 0–0

  2. Letang – Maatta13:20

    xG 0.93–0.75 (55%)attempts 19–9goals 0–1

  3. Orpik – Engelland12:58

    xG 0.45–1.16 (28%)attempts 13–15goals 0–1

New York Islanders

Forward lines

  1. bestNielsen – Grabner – Bailey10:02

    xG 0.61–0.46 (57%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

  2. McDonald – Martin – Cizikas7:58

    xG 0.47–0.33 (59%)attempts 7–10goals 0–0

  3. Bouchard – Regin – Clutterbuck6:34

    xG 0.23–0.30 (43%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  4. Vanek – Okposo – Tavares12:31

    xG 0.79–0.97 (45%)attempts 12–12goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMacDonald – Hamonic17:56

    xG 1.41–0.73 (66%)attempts 20–14goals 1–0

  2. Carkner – Ness8:37

    xG 0.42–0.33 (56%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  3. Hickey – Ness2:43

    xG 0.11–0.33 (24%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NYI 3.3 xGPIT 4.8 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NYIPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NYI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NYI is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #321 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.65 · 5 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 10% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50NYI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +31 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 71% of the time.

NYI winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (NYI − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).