Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Dec 8, 2013·United Center, Chicago

Florida Panthers 2, Chicago Blackhawks 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 53% of the time.

CHI winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA07210018235
CHI210211211632

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:10CHIPatrick SharpPPAssists: Jonathan Toews, Patrick Kane · Slap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:11CHIBrent SeabrookPPAssists: Brandon Saad, Marian Hossa · Slap, 0.06 xG0–2
  3. P2 0:37CHIMarian HossaGWGAssists: Patrick Sharp, Jonathan Toews · Wrist, 0.26 xG0–3
  4. P2 4:05FLADylan OlsenAssists: Tomas Kopecky, Tomas Fleischmann · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–3
  5. P2 9:37FLAMarcel GocUnassisted · Slap, 0.11 xG2–3
  6. P2 17:26CHIMichal HandzusAssists: Brent Seabrook, Patrick Kane · Backhand, 0.23 xG2–4
  7. P3 2:44CHIAndrew ShawPPAssists: Patrick Sharp, Patrick Kane · Tip-in, 0.17 xG2–5
  8. P3 19:04CHIBrandon SaadAssists: Jeremy Morin, Kris Versteeg · Backhand, 0.16 xG2–6
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 0:57FLATomas Kopecky: Interference2 min · PPG
  2. P1 7:21FLASean Bergenheim: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min · PPG
  3. P1 7:21FLASean Bergenheim: Interference2 min
  4. P1 14:23CHIPatrick Sharp: Slashing2 min
  5. P1 16:17CHIMarcus Kruger: High sticking2 min
  6. P2 5:13CHIBrandon Bollig: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 5:13FLAKrys Barch: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 11:39CHIMichal Rozsival: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  9. P3 2:06FLAKrys Barch: Illegal check to head2 min · PPG
  10. P3 5:10CHIAndrew Shaw: Interference2 min
  11. P3 10:53CHIBrandon Bollig: Fighting5 min
  12. P3 10:53FLAKrys Barch: Fighting5 min
  13. P3 13:27CHIBrent Seabrook: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
48% to win52% to win
← FLA attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Toews won the faceoff against Bjugstad
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLACHI
35Shots on goal32
3.0Expected goals2.8
69Shot attempts50
32Faceoffs won35
5Power plays4
15Penalty minutes17
23Hits9
9Blocked shots23
3Giveaways6
4Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestBergenheim – Hayes – Barkov8:44

    xG 0.97–0.60 (62%)attempts 13–10goals 0–1

  2. Kopecky – Goc – Fleischmann9:28

    xG 0.40–0.31 (57%)attempts 15–7goals 2–0

  3. Upshall – Bjugstad – Huberdeau11:41

    xG 0.20–0.41 (33%)attempts 12–10goals 0–1

  4. Barch – Matthias – Winchester3:04

    xG 0.04–0.28 (13%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCampbell – Kulikov3:01

    xG 0.36–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Campbell – Gilbert13:09

    xG 0.44–0.43 (50%)attempts 14–13goals 0–0

  3. Campbell – Weaver2:31

    xG 0.01–0.05 (18%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestMorin – Shaw – Saad4:57

    xG 0.45–0.05 (90%)attempts 7–5goals 0–0

  2. Smith – Kruger – Bollig8:34

    xG 0.19–0.17 (53%)attempts 5–10goals 0–0

  3. Handzus – Versteeg – Kane9:18

    xG 0.34–0.50 (41%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0

  4. Hossa – Sharp – Toews9:34

    xG 0.44–0.69 (39%)attempts 10–10goals 1–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestKeith – Seabrook11:02

    xG 1.25–0.55 (69%)attempts 17–10goals 2–1

  2. Rozsival – Leddy15:29

    xG 0.84–0.77 (52%)attempts 14–17goals 1–0

  3. Oduya – Hjalmarsson13:01

    xG 0.12–0.45 (21%)attempts 7–15goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 2.8 xGFLA 3.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHIFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 68/100 · #309 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.96 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 53% of the time.

CHI winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).