Mon, Dec 9, 2013·Rogers Arena, Vancouver
Carolina Hurricanes 0, Vancouver Canucks 2
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 64% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAR | 011 | 07 | 013 | 031 |
| VAN | 113 | 06 | 17 | 226 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 3:35VANChris TanevGWGAssists: Dan Hamhuis, Chris Higgins · Snap, 0.03 xG0–1
- P3 18:46VANJannik HansenENAssists: Chris Higgins · Wrist, 0.63 xG0–2
Penalties (8)
- P1 10:13VANHenrik Sedin: Holding2 min
- P1 12:29CARJay Harrison: Slashing2 min
- P1 19:41CARAndrej Sekera: Cross checking2 min
- P1 19:43VANRyan Kesler: Roughing2 min
- P2 2:29CARRyan Murphy: Tripping2 min
- P2 11:30VANJannik Hansen: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
- P2 18:14CARTim Gleason: Cross checking2 min
- P2 18:39VANJason Garrison: Slashing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Kesler won the faceoff against Staal
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Carolina Hurricanes
Forward lines
- bestDwyer – Tlusty – Nash6:15
xG 0.57–0.13 (81%)attempts 10–4goals 0–0
- Dvorak – Malhotra – Westgarth3:40
xG 0.10–0.03 (79%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0
- Malhotra – Dwyer – Tlusty2:06
xG 0.00–0.00attempts 0–1goals 0–0
- Gerbe – Staal – Lindholm8:44
xG 0.33–0.38 (47%)attempts 11–6goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestGleason – Harrison12:27
xG 0.54–0.29 (65%)attempts 12–6goals 0–0
- Sekera – Faulk15:54
xG 0.69–0.59 (54%)attempts 20–16goals 0–1
- Harrison – Murphy2:04
xG 0.06–0.05 (52%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0
Vancouver Canucks
Forward lines
- bestHiggins – Kesler – Santorelli12:07
xG 0.46–0.34 (58%)attempts 13–14goals 1–0
- Richardson – Hansen – Kassian2:19
xG 0.09–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0
- Dalpe – Weise – Welsh2:34
xG 0.12–0.05 (72%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0
- Richardson – Booth – Kassian7:05
xG 0.27–0.20 (57%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestHamhuis – Tanev9:02
xG 0.78–0.33 (70%)attempts 16–12goals 1–0
- Stanton – Tanev5:07
xG 0.17–0.03 (84%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0
- Hamhuis – Bieksa5:37
xG 0.18–0.22 (45%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 64% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (VAN − CAR), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).