Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Dec 10, 2013·BB&T Center, Sunrise

Detroit Red Wings 2, Florida Panthers 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 63% of the time.

FLA winsDET wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
DET1101907001226
FLA0801027022327

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:26DETTodd BertuzziPPAssists: Pavel Datsyuk, Johan Franzen · Wrist, 0.41 xG1–0
  2. P2 6:47DETPavel DatsyukAssists: Jonathan Ericsson, Johan Franzen · Tip-in, 0.06 xG2–0
  3. P3 5:00FLASean BergenheimAssists: Dmitry Kulikov, Aleksander Barkov · Tip-in, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P3 14:38FLANick BjugstadAssists: Erik Gudbranson, Dylan Olsen · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–2

Shootout

  1. 1. DET Daniel Alfredsson stopped
  2. 2. FLA Aleksander Barkov scored
  3. 3. DET Tomas Tatar scored
  4. 4. FLA Jonathan Huberdeau stopped
  5. 5. DET Gustav Nyquist stopped
  6. 6. FLA Brad Boyes scored
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 0:10FLAScottie Upshall: Delaying game face off violation2 min
  2. P1 9:19FLAAleksander Barkov: Tripping2 min · PPG
  3. P1 11:52FLASean Bergenheim: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 0:32DETStephen Weiss: Hooking2 min
  5. P2 7:37DETTomas Tatar: Holding2 min
  6. P3 8:06FLAErik Gudbranson: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 17:04DETTodd Bertuzzi: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DET00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0FLA
48% to win52% to win
← DET attackFLA attack →
  1. P1 20:00Bjugstad won the faceoff against Weiss
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DETFLA
26Shots on goal27
2.6Expected goals1.9
54Shot attempts51
30Faceoffs won32
4Power plays3
6Penalty minutes8
17Hits28
13Blocked shots18
4Giveaways3
2Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Detroit Red Wings

Forward lines

  1. bestAndersson – Nyquist – Tatar8:15

    xG 0.82–0.07 (92%)attempts 11–1goals 0–0

  2. Cleary – Miller – Emmerton6:36

    xG 0.14–0.11 (57%)attempts 6–6goals 0–0

  3. Bertuzzi – Datsyuk – Franzen12:55

    xG 0.27–0.76 (26%)attempts 12–12goals 1–1

  4. Alfredsson – Weiss – Abdelkader12:35

    xG 0.02–0.53 (4%)attempts 5–16goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKindl – Smith2:38

    xG 0.24–0.06 (80%)attempts 5–1goals 0–0

  2. Kindl – Lashoff8:32

    xG 0.17–0.07 (72%)attempts 4–9goals 0–0

  3. Kronwall – Ericsson14:26

    xG 0.62–0.64 (49%)attempts 15–12goals 1–1

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestUpshall – Bjugstad – Huberdeau11:44

    xG 0.87–0.25 (78%)attempts 13–8goals 1–0

  2. Boyes – Matthias – Winchester7:42

    xG 0.36–0.06 (87%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  3. Bergenheim – Hayes – Barkov10:59

    xG 0.16–0.15 (52%)attempts 9–4goals 1–0

  4. Boyes – Kopecky – Goc2:28

    xG 0.00–0.09 (0%)attempts 0–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestOlsen – Gudbranson13:26

    xG 0.77–0.28 (73%)attempts 12–11goals 1–1

  2. Weaver – Kulikov10:03

    xG 0.50–0.38 (57%)attempts 11–4goals 1–0

  3. Gilbert – Kulikov2:46

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–2goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

FLA 1.9 xGDET 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

FLADET

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

FLA's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line FLA is favoured, below it DET. Dots are goals.

Excitement 73/100 · #269 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.77 · 4 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 8% (winner's lowest chance)
DET 100%5050%50FLA 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +35 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Detroit Red Wings win this game 63% of the time.

FLA winsDET wins

Simulated goal difference (FLA − DET), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).