Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 12, 2013·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Buffalo Sabres 1, Ottawa Senators 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 64% of the time.

OTT winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF111013017141
OTT11317012232

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:22OTTBobby RyanAssists: Kyle Turris, Cory Conacher · Deflected, 0.08 xG0–1
  2. P1 17:39BUFTyler EnnisPPAssists: Drew Stafford, Jamie McBain · Wrap-around, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P2 6:39OTTZack SmithGWGAssists: Kyle Turris, Bobby Ryan · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–2
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 2:10BUFJohn Scott: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 17:01OTTZack Smith: High sticking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 0:47OTTErik Karlsson: Holding2 min
  4. P2 4:30BUFJohn Scott: Tripping2 min
  5. P2 11:08OTTEric Gryba: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 11:08BUFCody McCormick: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 12:25OTTErik Condra: High sticking2 min
  8. P3 11:31OTTEric Gryba: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 15:02BUFMark Pysyk: Interference2 min
  10. P3 17:57OTTMilan Michalek: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
48% to win52% to win
← BUF attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Ennis won the faceoff against Pageau
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFOTT
41Shots on goal32
2.2Expected goals1.5
66Shot attempts59
21Faceoffs won39
5Power plays3
11Penalty minutes15
17Hits29
16Blocked shots13
5Giveaways13
8Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestD'Agostini – Leino – Adam11:30

    xG 0.53–0.13 (80%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  2. Ott – Stafford – Foligno10:40

    xG 0.33–0.22 (60%)attempts 8–16goals 0–0

  3. McCormick – Scott – Flynn2:18

    xG 0.05–0.17 (21%)attempts 5–4goals 0–1

  4. Moulson – Ennis – Girgensons13:18

    xG 0.28–0.56 (34%)attempts 9–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestTallinder – Myers14:59

    xG 0.56–0.18 (76%)attempts 18–12goals 0–1

  2. Weber – Pysyk12:12

    xG 0.32–0.26 (55%)attempts 10–8goals 0–0

  3. Ehrhoff – McBain13:44

    xG 0.53–0.74 (42%)attempts 15–25goals 0–0

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestRyan – Turris – Conacher7:36

    xG 0.57–0.10 (85%)attempts 9–5goals 1–0

  2. Spezza – MacArthur – Zibanejad10:49

    xG 0.37–0.13 (74%)attempts 12–8goals 0–0

  3. Neil – Greening – Pageau8:10

    xG 0.10–0.14 (43%)attempts 13–5goals 0–0

  4. Michalek – Condra – Smith10:05

    xG 0.14–0.75 (16%)attempts 8–13goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestPhillips – Ceci13:38

    xG 0.67–0.34 (66%)attempts 13–13goals 1–0

  2. Corvo – Karlsson15:59

    xG 0.52–0.49 (51%)attempts 20–11goals 0–0

  3. Gryba – Wiercioch9:28

    xG 0.10–0.47 (17%)attempts 10–15goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 1.5 xGBUF 2.2 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 27/100 · #830 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.12 · 3 goals in reachComeback index 50% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Buffalo Sabres win this game 64% of the time.

OTT winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).