Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Dec 19, 2013·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Minnesota Wild 2, Pittsburgh Penguins 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 59% of the time.

PIT winsMIN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
MIN0917110226
PIT11331617536

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:49PITChris KunitzAssists: Pascal Dupuis, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.39 xG0–1
  2. P2 1:54PITBrandon SutterAssists: Olli Maatta, Joe Vitale · Wrist, 0.03 xG0–2
  3. P2 3:33PITMatt NiskanenPPGWGAssists: Jussi Jokinen, James Neal · Slap, 0.06 xG0–3
  4. P2 10:43PITChris KunitzAssists: Sidney Crosby, Matt Niskanen · Wrist, 0.15 xG0–4
  5. P2 11:20MINJason PominvilleAssists: Nino Niederreiter, Ryan Suter · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–4
  6. P3 3:13MINDany HeatleyAssists: Zenon Konopka, Keith Ballard · Wrist, 0.35 xG2–4
  7. P3 7:54PITOlli MaattaUnassisted · Wrist, 0.32 xG2–5
Penalties (18)
  1. P1 2:19PITCraig Adams: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 2:19MINZenon Konopka: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 4:19PITChuck Kobasew: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 4:19MINKeith Ballard: Fighting5 min
  5. P1 10:14MINMikko Koivu: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 2:27MINNino Niederreiter: Interference2 min · PPG
  7. P2 3:55PITBrian Dumoulin: Hooking2 min
  8. P2 6:36PITSidney Crosby: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  9. P2 10:18MINKeith Ballard: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 10:18PITJames Neal: Fighting5 min
  11. P2 10:18PITJames Neal: Roughing2 min
  12. P2 10:18MINKeith Ballard: Clipping2 min
  13. P3 5:44PITOlli Maatta: Hooking2 min
  14. P3 5:58PITCraig Adams: Interference2 min
  15. P3 7:54MINJonas Brodin: Penalty shot hooking on breakaway0 min
  16. P3 13:12PITMatt Niskanen: Holding2 min
  17. P3 14:41MINCharlie Coyle: Interference2 min
  18. P3 17:58MINBrett Bulmer: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

MIN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
48% to win52% to win
← MIN attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Brodziak won the faceoff against Jokinen
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

MINPIT
26Shots on goal36
2.5Expected goals3.0
51Shot attempts60
38Faceoffs won24
5Power plays4
25Penalty minutes27
19Hits14
13Blocked shots10
4Giveaways5
1Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Minnesota Wild

Forward lines

  1. bestKoivu – Pominville – Parise2:56

    xG 0.13–0.03 (79%)attempts 5–3goals 0–1

  2. Heatley – Konopka – Bulmer3:08

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

  3. Pominville – Haula – Niederreiter7:33

    xG 0.31–0.34 (47%)attempts 7–11goals 1–0

  4. Cooke – Brodziak – Mitchell6:11

    xG 0.01–0.10 (9%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBallard – Stoner7:00

    xG 0.43–0.14 (75%)attempts 7–7goals 1–1

  2. Suter – Brodin11:53

    xG 0.18–0.25 (42%)attempts 9–9goals 0–0

  3. Scandella – Brodin4:29

    xG 0.08–0.18 (32%)attempts 3–6goals 0–1

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestDupuis – Kunitz – Crosby8:49

    xG 0.94–0.25 (79%)attempts 13–10goals 2–0

  2. Jokinen – Neal – Zolnierczyk4:12

    xG 0.17–0.02 (90%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Kunitz – Crosby – Neal3:29

    xG 0.13–0.01 (92%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  4. Vitale – Conner – Sutter4:42

    xG 0.04–0.15 (19%)attempts 3–6goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNiskanen – Maatta15:51

    xG 1.35–0.58 (70%)attempts 17–11goals 3–1

  2. Despres – Samuelsson13:33

    xG 0.32–0.13 (70%)attempts 16–13goals 0–0

  3. Bortuzzo – Dumoulin12:21

    xG 0.23–0.44 (35%)attempts 10–14goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 3.0 xGMIN 2.5 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITMIN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it MIN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 62/100 · #411 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.69 · 6 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
MIN 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 59% of the time.

PIT winsMIN wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − MIN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).