Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Jan 3, 2014·Prudential Center, Newark

Chicago Blackhawks 5, New Jersey Devils 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New Jersey Devils win this game 54% of the time.

NJD winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI0611147524
NJD0811029327

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 1:34CHIPatrick SharpAssists: Jonathan Toews · Snap, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P2 2:17NJDAndy GreeneAssists: Stephen Gionta, Steve Bernier · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P3 1:30CHIBrandon SaadAssists: Patrick Kane, Brent Seabrook · Tip-in, 0.10 xG2–1
  4. P3 2:44CHIPatrick SharpAssists: Brent Seabrook, Duncan Keith · Snap, 0.04 xG3–1
  5. P3 5:34CHIMarian HossaGWGAssists: Jonathan Toews, Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.06 xG4–1
  6. P3 7:09NJDMarek ZidlickyAssists: Andrei Loktionov, Reid Boucher · Snap, 0.11 xG4–2
  7. P3 13:37NJDMarek ZidlickyPPAssists: Eric Gelinas, Adam Henrique · Slap, 0.04 xG4–3
  8. P3 18:32CHIPatrick SharpAssists: Duncan Keith · Wrist, 0.17 xG5–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 0:42NJDMark Fayne: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 3:39NJDMike Sislo: Too many men on the ice2 min
  3. P1 19:10CHIMarcus Kruger: Hooking2 min
  4. P2 6:25CHISheldon Brookbank: Closing hand on puck2 min
  5. P2 15:54CHIMarcus Kruger: Holding2 min
  6. P2 16:43NJDJaromir Jagr: Hooking2 min
  7. P3 12:04CHIPatrick Kane: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NJD
48% to win52% to win
← CHI attackNJD attack →
  1. P1 20:00Zajac won the faceoff against Hossa
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHINJD
24Shots on goal27
2.3Expected goals2.5
36Shot attempts47
26Faceoffs won29
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
6Hits18
11Blocked shots7
0Giveaways2
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestHossa – Sharp – Toews10:38

    xG 0.70–0.09 (89%)attempts 8–3goals 3–0

  2. Smith – Kruger – Bollig9:42

    xG 0.05–0.26 (16%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Bickell – Versteeg – Shaw6:47

    xG 0.16–0.49 (25%)attempts 3–13goals 0–1

  4. Handzus – Kane – Saad11:27

    xG 0.36–0.87 (29%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestOduya – Hjalmarsson16:21

    xG 0.72–0.32 (69%)attempts 9–10goals 0–0

  2. Keith – Seabrook14:05

    xG 0.86–0.77 (53%)attempts 13–10goals 3–0

  3. Brookbank – Leddy11:36

    xG 0.04–0.63 (6%)attempts 5–10goals 0–1

New Jersey Devils

Forward lines

  1. bestLoktionov – Sislo – Boucher7:56

    xG 0.63–0.16 (79%)attempts 13–3goals 0–0

  2. Bernier – Gionta – Carter9:36

    xG 0.66–0.22 (75%)attempts 9–5goals 1–1

  3. Jagr – Zubrus – Zajac12:43

    xG 0.13–0.33 (28%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Ryder – Clowe – Henrique11:10

    xG 0.22–0.75 (23%)attempts 5–14goals 0–4

Defence pairs

  1. bestZidlicky – Gelinas15:55

    xG 0.65–0.34 (65%)attempts 15–7goals 1–1

  2. Salvador – Merrill13:03

    xG 0.64–0.45 (59%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

  3. Fayne – Greene12:49

    xG 0.42–0.39 (52%)attempts 6–7goals 1–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NJD 2.5 xGCHI 2.3 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NJDCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NJD's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NJD is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 77/100 · #235 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.35 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50NJD 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New Jersey Devils win this game 54% of the time.

NJD winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (NJD − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).