Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Jan 7, 2014·Rogers Arena, Vancouver

Pittsburgh Penguins 5, Vancouver Canucks 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 66% of the time.

VAN winsPIT wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
PIT11317212031535
VAN0811038000426

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:15PITBrian GibbonsUnassisted · Backhand, 0.16 xG1–0
  2. P2 5:25PITEvgeni MalkinAssists: James Neal, Olli Maatta · Wrist, 0.05 xG2–0
  3. P2 15:35VANJason GarrisonUnassisted · Wrist, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P3 7:39VANChris TanevAssists: Dan Hamhuis, Zack Kassian · Slap, 0.02 xG2–2
  5. P3 13:07VANChris HigginsAssists: Jannik Hansen, Yannick Weber · Backhand, 0.20 xG2–3
  6. P3 13:24VANZack KassianAssists: Chris Higgins, Kevin Bieksa · Backhand, 0.11 xG2–4
  7. P3 18:49PITKris LetangAssists: Jussi Jokinen, Sidney Crosby · Slap, 0.00 xG3–4
  8. P3 19:05PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Chris Kunitz, Jussi Jokinen · Wrist, 0.15 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. VAN Zack Kassian stopped
  2. 2. PIT Jussi Jokinen stopped
  3. 3. VAN Mike Santorelli stopped
  4. 4. PIT Sidney Crosby scored
  5. 5. VAN Chris Higgins stopped
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 10:35PITTaylor Pyatt: Interference2 min
  2. P1 15:15VANJason Garrison: Holding2 min
  3. P2 18:27PITSimon Despres: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 8:57VANTom Sestito: Charging2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PIT00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0VAN
48% to win52% to win
← PIT attackVAN attack →
  1. P1 20:00Santorelli won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PITVAN
35Shots on goal26
3.3Expected goals2.3
62Shot attempts57
30Faceoffs won34
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
25Hits36
14Blocked shots12
5Giveaways5
5Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Crosby – Gibbons11:22

    xG 0.64–0.22 (74%)attempts 11–14goals 1–2

  2. Jokinen – Malkin – Neal12:12

    xG 0.82–0.59 (58%)attempts 17–10goals 0–0

  3. Pyatt – Glass – Sutter6:23

    xG 0.09–0.03 (72%)attempts 5–6goals 0–0

  4. Kunitz – Malkin – Crosby2:23

    xG 0.00–0.20 (0%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScuderi – Letang13:27

    xG 0.81–0.31 (73%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  2. Orpik – Despres12:05

    xG 0.63–0.29 (69%)attempts 15–11goals 0–1

  3. Niskanen – Letang2:01

    xG 0.05–0.04 (54%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Santorelli13:23

    xG 0.59–0.12 (83%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

  2. Richardson – Hansen – Sestito8:46

    xG 0.47–0.23 (67%)attempts 12–4goals 0–1

  3. Ferriero – Dalpe – Archibald3:15

    xG 0.02–0.04 (31%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Higgins – Kesler – Kassian13:08

    xG 0.45–0.98 (32%)attempts 11–16goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeber – Corrado9:16

    xG 0.33–0.17 (67%)attempts 10–4goals 1–0

  2. Hamhuis – Tanev19:01

    xG 0.93–0.97 (49%)attempts 17–20goals 1–1

  3. Bieksa – Garrison18:32

    xG 0.80–0.90 (47%)attempts 17–19goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

VAN 2.3 xGPIT 3.3 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

VANPIT

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

VAN's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line VAN is favoured, below it PIT. Dots are goals.

Excitement 96/100 · #41 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.58 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 0% (winner's lowest chance)
PIT 100%5050%50VAN 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +48 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 66% of the time.

VAN winsPIT wins

Simulated goal difference (VAN − PIT), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).