Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Jan 16, 2014·Jobing.com Arena, Glendale

Vancouver Canucks 0, Phoenix Coyotes 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Phoenix Coyotes win this game 54% of the time.

PHX winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN0110909029
PHX1110804123

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:51PHXAntoine VermettePPGWGAssists: Keith Yandle, Oliver Ekman-Larsson · Wrist, 0.17 xG0–1
Penalties (20)
  1. P1 1:03VANKevin Bieksa: Interference2 min
  2. P1 3:56PHXKyle Chipchura: Interference2 min
  3. P1 7:30PHXMichael Stone: Hooking2 min
  4. P1 11:52VANJason Garrison: Holding2 min · PPG
  5. P1 18:23PHXMartin Hanzal: Slashing2 min
  6. P1 19:03VANDaniel Sedin: Tripping2 min
  7. P1 19:03PHXLauri Korpikoski: Cross checking2 min
  8. P2 4:05PHXMartin Hanzal: Tripping2 min
  9. P2 5:13VANDale Weise: Boarding2 min
  10. P2 7:36VANZack Kassian: Too many men on the ice2 min
  11. P2 8:15VANDan Hamhuis: Slashing2 min
  12. P2 8:15PHXMike Ribeiro: Hooking2 min
  13. P2 19:12VANAlexander Edler: Tripping2 min
  14. P3 1:20PHXMike Ribeiro: Slashing2 min
  15. P3 1:20VANKevin Bieksa: Diving2 min
  16. P3 8:27PHXOliver Ekman-Larsson: Diving2 min
  17. P3 8:27VANZack Kassian: Hooking2 min
  18. P3 9:57PHXDavid Schlemko: Interference2 min
  19. P3 13:10VANHenrik Sedin: Hooking2 min
  20. P3 15:55PHXMartin Hanzal: High sticking double minor4 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHX
48% to win52% to win
← VAN attackPHX attack →
  1. Press play, or drag along the timeline.
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANPHX
29Shots on goal23
2.8Expected goals3.1
55Shot attempts55
28Faceoffs won30
7Power plays6
20Penalty minutes22
18Hits24
13Blocked shots10
7Giveaways4
2Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestSedin – Sedin – Kesler6:07

    xG 0.36–0.17 (68%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

  2. Higgins – Richardson – Hansen4:13

    xG 0.16–0.01 (91%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Booth – Santorelli – Weise5:22

    xG 0.11–0.13 (47%)attempts 3–6goals 0–0

  4. Sedin – Sedin – Kassian2:23

    xG 0.09–0.13 (41%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBieksa – Edler10:52

    xG 0.61–0.51 (55%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0

  2. Hamhuis – Tanev7:22

    xG 0.04–0.02 (72%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  3. Weber – Garrison5:37

    xG 0.14–0.39 (27%)attempts 4–8goals 0–0

Phoenix Coyotes

Forward lines

  1. bestVrbata – Hanzal – Kennedy5:11

    xG 0.38–0.13 (74%)attempts 5–5goals 0–0

  2. Halpern – Chipchura – Szwarz4:18

    xG 0.14–0.08 (64%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

  3. Vermette – Korpikoski – Boedker7:15

    xG 0.15–0.41 (28%)attempts 4–7goals 0–0

  4. Doan – Ribeiro – Moss8:34

    xG 0.27–0.55 (33%)attempts 8–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMichalek – Schlemko8:38

    xG 0.68–0.16 (81%)attempts 12–3goals 0–0

  2. Morris – Yandle2:04

    xG 0.01–0.04 (25%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

  3. Morris – Ekman-Larsson9:22

    xG 0.31–0.53 (37%)attempts 8–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHX 3.1 xGVAN 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHXVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHX's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHX is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 9/100 · #1078 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.75 · 1 goal in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50PHX 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Phoenix Coyotes win this game 54% of the time.

PHX winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (PHX − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).