Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 18, 2014·First Niagara Center, Buffalo

Columbus Blue Jackets 4, Buffalo Sabres 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 68% of the time.

BUF winsCBJ wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CBJ21411405021435
BUF2601317030329

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:59BUFTyler MyersAssists: Matt Moulson, Tyler Ennis · Wrist, 0.06 xG0–1
  2. P1 6:19CBJDavid SavardAssists: Derek MacKenzie, Mark Letestu · Slap, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P1 6:47BUFDrew StaffordAssists: Tyler Ennis · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–2
  4. P1 12:44CBJMatt CalvertAssists: Nikita Nikitin, Brandon Dubinsky · Backhand, 0.30 xG2–2
  5. P2 11:21CBJBrandon DubinskyPPAssists: Cam Atkinson, James Wisniewski · Wrist, 0.23 xG3–2
  6. P3 19:35BUFTyler MyersPPAssists: Cody Hodgson, Christian Ehrhoff · Wrist, 0.04 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. BUF Matt Moulson stopped
  2. 2. CBJ Cam Atkinson stopped
  3. 3. BUF Tyler Ennis stopped
  4. 4. CBJ Mark Letestu stopped
  5. 5. BUF Cody Hodgson stopped
  6. 6. CBJ Ryan Johansen scored
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 10:43BUFTyler Myers: Boarding2 min
  2. P2 3:38CBJDalton Prout: Interference2 min
  3. P2 11:03BUFZenon Konopka: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG
  4. P2 14:45CBJNathan Horton: Slashing2 min
  5. P2 18:05CBJNathan Horton: Tripping2 min
  6. P3 19:23CBJDavid Savard: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. OT 5:00BUFChristian Ehrhoff: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CBJ00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0BUF
48% to win52% to win
← CBJ attackBUF attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dubinsky won the faceoff against Ennis
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CBJBUF
35Shots on goal29
3.6Expected goals2.5
73Shot attempts52
25Faceoffs won33
2Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
30Hits24
12Blocked shots21
5Giveaways12
3Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestUmberger – Foligno – Johansen13:15

    xG 0.78–0.04 (95%)attempts 19–3goals 0–0

  2. Dubinsky – Calvert – Atkinson10:06

    xG 0.75–0.56 (57%)attempts 11–9goals 1–2

  3. Horton – Anisimov – Jenner10:36

    xG 0.28–0.11 (71%)attempts 13–4goals 0–0

  4. MacKenzie – Letestu – Tropp8:30

    xG 0.36–0.36 (50%)attempts 9–6goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWisniewski – Murray14:29

    xG 0.75–0.47 (61%)attempts 20–10goals 0–2

  2. Johnson – Prout16:23

    xG 0.30–0.33 (48%)attempts 13–10goals 0–0

  3. Nikitin – Savard14:28

    xG 0.49–0.57 (46%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestMoulson – Stafford – Ennis13:43

    xG 0.83–0.55 (60%)attempts 12–10goals 2–0

  2. Konopka – Ellis – Scott3:48

    xG 0.02–0.03 (41%)attempts 1–4goals 0–0

  3. Foligno – Flynn – Girgensons10:01

    xG 0.34–0.37 (48%)attempts 6–12goals 0–1

  4. Ott – Ellis – Hodgson4:03

    xG 0.03–0.21 (12%)attempts 2–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – McBain2:12

    xG 0.19–0.04 (82%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  2. Weber – Myers13:52

    xG 0.47–0.54 (47%)attempts 8–17goals 0–1

  3. Ehrhoff – Pysyk15:45

    xG 0.29–0.47 (38%)attempts 7–11goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

BUF 2.5 xGCBJ 3.6 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

BUFCBJ

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

BUF's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line BUF is favoured, below it CBJ. Dots are goals.

Excitement 85/100 · #145 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.28 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 28% (winner's lowest chance)
CBJ 100%5050%50BUF 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +43 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 68% of the time.

BUF winsCBJ wins

Simulated goal difference (BUF − CBJ), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).