Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Jan 25, 2014·Nationwide Arena, Columbus

Buffalo Sabres 5, Columbus Blue Jackets 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 79% of the time.

CBJ winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF291528522
CBJ111013114238

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:21BUFMatt EllisAssists: Henrik Tallinder, Ville Leino · Backhand, 0.02 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:53CBJDerek MacKenzieAssists: Ryan Murray, Mark Letestu · Wrist, 0.08 xG1–1
  3. P1 19:30BUFChristian EhrhoffSHUnassisted · Slap, 0.02 xG2–1
  4. P2 3:28BUFMarcus FolignoSHGWGAssists: Jamie McBain, Christian Ehrhoff · Wrist, 0.06 xG3–1
  5. P3 3:51BUFSteve OttAssists: Cody Hodgson, Christian Ehrhoff · Wrist, 0.39 xG4–1
  6. P3 5:21CBJMark LetestuAssists: Derek MacKenzie, Corey Tropp · Wrist, 0.24 xG4–2
  7. P3 18:09BUFCody HodgsonENUnassisted · Wrist, 0.60 xG5–2
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 17:20CBJCody Bass: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 17:20BUFZenon Konopka: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 18:15BUFTyler Ennis: Elbowing2 min
  4. P2 2:30BUFMike Weber: High sticking2 min
  5. P2 17:17BUFMike Weber: Hooking2 min
  6. P3 5:58CBJJack Johnson: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 11:35BUFTyler Myers: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CBJ
48% to win52% to win
← BUF attackCBJ attack →
  1. P1 20:00Dubinsky won the faceoff against Ennis
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFCBJ
22Shots on goal38
1.9Expected goals3.6
32Shot attempts92
28Faceoffs won27
1Power plays4
13Penalty minutes7
21Hits22
30Blocked shots6
3Giveaways1
5Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestOtt – Hodgson – Girgensons8:59

    xG 0.48–0.20 (70%)attempts 7–13goals 1–0

  2. Konopka – Ellis – Leino3:18

    xG 0.13–0.12 (50%)attempts 2–3goals 1–1

  3. Ellis – Moulson – Ennis2:09

    xG 0.09–0.23 (28%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

  4. Foligno – Varone – Flynn9:15

    xG 0.22–0.55 (29%)attempts 6–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – Ruhwedel13:22

    xG 0.74–0.56 (57%)attempts 13–21goals 1–0

  2. Weber – McBain13:23

    xG 0.09–0.81 (10%)attempts 2–26goals 0–1

  3. Tallinder – Myers16:17

    xG 0.16–1.31 (11%)attempts 8–24goals 1–1

Columbus Blue Jackets

Forward lines

  1. bestDubinsky – Calvert – Atkinson11:26

    xG 0.82–0.04 (96%)attempts 21–5goals 0–0

  2. Horton – Anisimov – Jenner10:41

    xG 0.57–0.14 (80%)attempts 18–4goals 0–0

  3. MacKenzie – Letestu – Tropp6:25

    xG 0.44–0.05 (90%)attempts 8–7goals 2–1

  4. Umberger – Foligno – Johansen11:34

    xG 0.79–0.50 (62%)attempts 26–4goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestNikitin – Murray3:16

    xG 0.46–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–1goals 1–0

  2. Tyutin – Johnson8:48

    xG 0.62–0.21 (75%)attempts 13–7goals 0–0

  3. Wisniewski – Murray7:32

    xG 0.54–0.16 (77%)attempts 17–5goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CBJ 3.6 xGBUF 1.9 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CBJBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CBJ's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CBJ is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 52/100 · #536 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.97 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50CBJ 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +17 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Columbus Blue Jackets win this game 79% of the time.

CBJ winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (CBJ − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).