Sat, Feb 1, 2014·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles
Philadelphia Flyers 2, Los Angeles Kings 0
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 78% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 04 | 15 | 14 | 213 |
| LAK | 08 | 014 | 013 | 035 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P2 7:48PHIWayne SimmondsGWGAssists: Vincent Lecavalier, Claude Giroux · Wrist, 0.13 xG1–0
- P3 18:02PHIClaude GirouxPPAssists: Scott Hartnell, Wayne Simmonds · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–0
Penalties (5)
- P1 2:58LAKJordan Nolan: Interference2 min
- P1 16:50PHIMark Streit: Slashing2 min
- P3 11:56PHIAdam Hall: Delaying game face off violation2 min
- P3 17:07LAKMatt Greene: Interference2 min · PPG
- P3 19:42PHIErik Gustafsson: Slashing2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Kopitar won the faceoff against Schenn
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Philadelphia Flyers
Forward lines
- Hall – Rinaldo – Raffl6:53
xG 0.08–0.09 (47%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0
- Downie – Read – Couturier11:22
xG 0.21–0.27 (43%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0
- Lecavalier – Simmonds – Schenn11:54
xG 0.15–0.45 (24%)attempts 3–18goals 0–0
- Hartnell – Giroux – Voracek11:50
xG 0.09–0.77 (11%)attempts 6–14goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Streit – Meszaros12:48
xG 0.12–0.27 (31%)attempts 6–14goals 0–0
- Coburn – Grossmann16:24
xG 0.18–0.65 (22%)attempts 5–17goals 0–0
- Schenn – Gustafsson17:24
xG 0.26–1.02 (20%)attempts 8–21goals 0–0
Los Angeles Kings
Forward lines
- bestStoll – Lewis – King10:58
xG 0.79–0.07 (92%)attempts 19–5goals 0–0
- Carter – Kopitar – Toffoli14:07
xG 0.51–0.23 (69%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0
- Williams – Brown – Richards12:03
xG 0.40–0.38 (51%)attempts 12–6goals 0–1
- Fraser – Clifford – Nolan8:28
xG 0.07–0.08 (46%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- bestMitchell – Greene11:55
xG 0.43–0.05 (89%)attempts 15–5goals 0–0
- Muzzin – Doughty15:54
xG 0.68–0.48 (59%)attempts 21–10goals 0–1
- Regehr – Voynov17:17
xG 0.39–0.26 (60%)attempts 14–6goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, Los Angeles Kings win this game 78% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (LAK − PHI), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).