Fri, Feb 7, 2014·Prudential Center, Newark
Edmonton Oilers 1, New Jersey Devils 2 (OT)
Expected result
Based on shot quality alone, New Jersey Devils win this game 57% of the time.
By period
Goals and shots on goal in each period.
| Team | P1 | P2 | P3 | OT | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EDM | 15 | 06 | 08 | 01 | 120 |
| NJD | 18 | 010 | 05 | 11 | 224 |
Goals, with shots on goal in grey.
Scoring
Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.
- P1 11:01NJDAndrei LoktionovAssists: Bryce Salvador, Jaromir Jagr · Wrist, 0.14 xG0–1
- P1 11:30EDMTaylor HallAssists: Nail Yakupov, Ryan Nugent-Hopkins · Wrist, 0.09 xG1–1
- OT 2:34NJDJon MerrillGWGAssists: Michael Ryder, Adam Henrique · Slap, 0.12 xG1–2
Penalties (6)
- P1 13:02NJDDainius Zubrus: Tripping2 min
- P2 1:23NJDAndy Greene: High sticking2 min
- P2 2:20EDMDavid Perron: Hooking2 min
- P2 6:13EDMMark Fraser: Boarding2 min
- P3 9:25EDMAles Hemsky: Tripping2 min
- P3 10:59NJDAdam Henrique: Hooking2 min
Replay
Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.
20:00
P1
- P1 20:00Zajac won the faceoff against Gagner
- Goal
- Shot
- Miss
- Block
- Hit
- Takeaway
- Giveaway
- Faceoff
- Penalty
The numbers
Team totals, side by side.
Line combinations that worked
Model-basedEach team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.
Edmonton Oilers
Forward lines
- bestHall – Nugent-Hopkins – Yakupov11:06
xG 0.59–0.31 (66%)attempts 9–10goals 1–0
- Hendricks – Hemsky – Gordon8:55
xG 0.11–0.13 (45%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0
- Smyth – Joensuu – Gazdic4:51
xG 0.03–0.27 (9%)attempts 2–6goals 0–1
- Gagner – Perron – Eberle11:53
xG 0.25–0.57 (30%)attempts 5–11goals 0–0
Defence pairs
- Petry – Marincin15:49
xG 0.56–0.63 (47%)attempts 11–12goals 0–0
- Schultz – Schultz15:43
xG 0.52–0.61 (46%)attempts 6–13goals 1–0
- Ference – Fraser9:39
xG 0.24–0.43 (35%)attempts 5–7goals 0–1
New Jersey Devils
Forward lines
- bestRyder – Clowe – Henrique13:29
xG 0.77–0.26 (75%)attempts 13–4goals 0–0
- Jagr – Zubrus – Loktionov5:03
xG 0.26–0.04 (86%)attempts 5–4goals 1–0
- Jagr – Zubrus – Zajac7:30
xG 0.39–0.19 (67%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0
- Elias – Zajac – Brunner5:04
xG 0.14–0.09 (60%)attempts 5–2goals 0–1
Defence pairs
- bestHarrold – Merrill14:39
xG 0.90–0.29 (76%)attempts 11–7goals 0–0
- Salvador – Zidlicky12:45
xG 0.76–0.26 (75%)attempts 12–7goals 1–0
- Greene – Harrold2:40
xG 0.13–0.00 (100%)attempts 3–0goals 0–0
How the game flowed
Model-basedChance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.
Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.
Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute
Win probability
Model-basedHow each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.
NJD's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NJD is favoured, below it EDM. Dots are goals.
Did the better team win?
Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.
Based on shot quality alone, New Jersey Devils win this game 57% of the time.
Simulated goal difference (NJD − EDM), 10,000 replays
The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).