Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 7, 2014·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

New York Rangers 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 3 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 59% of the time.

PIT winsNYR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
NYR11511718012441
PIT1121918001329

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:04NYRBenoit PouliotAssists: Mats Zuccarello, Marc Staal · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–0
  2. P1 11:43PITOlli MaattaPPAssists: Sidney Crosby, Jussi Jokinen · Backhand, 0.25 xG1–1
  3. P2 0:34NYRDan GirardiPPAssists: Derick Brassard · Snap, 0.03 xG2–1
  4. P2 8:29PITEvgeni MalkinPPAssists: James Neal, Matt Niskanen · Slap, 0.04 xG2–2
  5. P3 9:24NYRBenoit PouliotPPAssists: Dan Girardi, Brad Richards · Wrist, 0.16 xG3–2
  6. P3 17:04PITJames NealAssists: Olli Maatta, Jayson Megna · Wrist, 0.11 xG3–3

Shootout

  1. 1. PIT Jussi Jokinen stopped
  2. 2. NYR Benoit Pouliot stopped
  3. 3. PIT Sidney Crosby stopped
  4. 4. NYR Mats Zuccarello scored
  5. 5. PIT Evgeni Malkin scored
  6. 6. NYR Brad Richards scored
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 10:15NYRCarl Hagelin: Interference2 min · PPG
  2. P2 0:30PITJames Neal: Slashing2 min · PPG
  3. P2 5:51PITBrooks Orpik: Interference2 min
  4. P2 8:11NYRRick Nash: Interference2 min · PPG
  5. P2 13:27NYRRick Nash: Tripping2 min
  6. P2 14:06NYRCarl Hagelin: Hooking2 min
  7. P2 14:06PITJames Neal: Diving2 min
  8. P2 15:10NYRMats Zuccarello: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 15:10PITChris Kunitz: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 15:10PITChris Kunitz: Roughing2 min
  11. P3 3:22PITHarry Zolnierczyk: Roughing2 min
  12. P3 3:22NYRDominic Moore: Roughing2 min
  13. P3 5:26NYRRyan McDonagh: Holding2 min
  14. P3 8:58PITBrooks Orpik: Holding2 min · PPG
  15. OT 5:00PITEvgeni Malkin: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NYR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
48% to win52% to win
← NYR attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Stepan won the faceoff against Malkin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NYRPIT
41Shots on goal29
2.9Expected goals2.4
68Shot attempts55
34Faceoffs won34
5Power plays4
14Penalty minutes16
22Hits31
14Blocked shots10
2Giveaways9
4Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

New York Rangers

Forward lines

  1. bestNash – Stepan – Kreider12:25

    xG 0.71–0.23 (76%)attempts 18–4goals 0–0

  2. Richards – Callahan – Hagelin11:44

    xG 0.59–0.26 (69%)attempts 15–9goals 0–0

  3. Pouliot – Brassard – Zuccarello10:40

    xG 0.68–0.42 (62%)attempts 9–12goals 1–0

  4. Moore – Boyle – Carcillo6:08

    xG 0.18–0.21 (46%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestKlein – Moore10:46

    xG 0.34–0.07 (83%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  2. Staal – Stralman16:53

    xG 0.97–0.71 (58%)attempts 21–15goals 1–1

  3. Girardi – McDonagh16:34

    xG 0.53–0.54 (50%)attempts 14–14goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Crosby – Gibbons6:32

    xG 0.60–0.19 (76%)attempts 8–5goals 0–0

  2. Jokinen – Malkin – Neal11:13

    xG 0.47–0.63 (43%)attempts 11–17goals 0–0

  3. Glass – Sutter – Megna8:14

    xG 0.05–0.30 (14%)attempts 5–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestNiskanen – Maatta15:20

    xG 0.79–0.65 (55%)attempts 19–16goals 1–0

  2. Orpik – Martin13:42

    xG 0.37–0.48 (43%)attempts 8–14goals 0–0

  3. Scuderi – Bortuzzo10:20

    xG 0.15–0.67 (19%)attempts 6–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.4 xGNYR 2.9 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITNYR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it NYR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 80/100 · #198 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.16 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
NYR 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +39 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, New York Rangers win this game 59% of the time.

PIT winsNYR wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − NYR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).