Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Feb 7, 2014·PNC Arena, Raleigh

Florida Panthers 1, Carolina Hurricanes 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 66% of the time.

CAR winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
FLA110015010135
CAR31219111532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:17CARRiley NashAssists: Tuomo Ruutu · Wrist, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P1 10:44CARAlexander SeminGWGUnassisted · Wrist, 0.26 xG0–2
  3. P1 15:30FLANick BjugstadAssists: Dylan Olsen, Scottie Upshall · Wrist, 0.04 xG1–2
  4. P1 18:21CARBrett BellemoreAssists: Elias Lindholm, Jeff Skinner · Slap, 0.03 xG1–3
  5. P2 4:36CARJiri TlustyAssists: Eric Staal · Wrist, 0.28 xG1–4
  6. P3 12:48CARAndrej SekeraPPAssists: Jeff Skinner, Jordan Staal · Wrist, 0.02 xG1–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P2 7:39CARAndrej Sekera: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  2. P2 7:50FLATom Gilbert: Interference2 min
  3. P2 9:49FLAAleksander Barkov: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  4. P2 12:20CARTuomo Ruutu: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  5. P2 14:31FLAErik Gudbranson: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 14:31CARBrett Bellemore: Fighting5 min
  7. P2 15:18CARManny Malhotra: Holding2 min
  8. P3 12:42FLABrad Boyes: Hooking2 min · PPG
  9. P3 13:36CARJordan Staal: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CAR
48% to win52% to win
← FLA attackCAR attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Barkov
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLACAR
35Shots on goal32
4.1Expected goals3.2
81Shot attempts61
21Faceoffs won28
4Power plays3
11Penalty minutes13
30Hits23
14Blocked shots24
11Giveaways12
11Takeaways14

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestKopecky – Goc – Winchester10:05

    xG 0.61–0.11 (84%)attempts 17–9goals 0–0

  2. Upshall – Bjugstad – Huberdeau9:07

    xG 0.88–0.75 (54%)attempts 18–12goals 1–2

  3. Gomez – Fleischmann – Matthias12:00

    xG 0.29–0.69 (29%)attempts 7–15goals 0–1

  4. Boyes – Bergenheim – Barkov12:28

    xG 0.31–0.74 (30%)attempts 13–13goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestCampbell – Olsen2:18

    xG 0.37–0.11 (77%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  2. Olsen – Kulikov11:19

    xG 0.65–0.63 (51%)attempts 17–12goals 1–1

  3. Kulikov – Gudbranson2:15

    xG 0.02–0.04 (38%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestSemin – Staal – Tlusty11:26

    xG 0.79–0.54 (59%)attempts 12–20goals 2–0

  2. Staal – Skinner – Lindholm9:55

    xG 0.51–0.42 (55%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

  3. Ruutu – Nash – Bowman11:56

    xG 0.71–0.65 (52%)attempts 17–12goals 1–0

  4. Malhotra – Dwyer – Gerbe9:42

    xG 0.23–0.61 (27%)attempts 6–18goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestSekera – Faulk15:34

    xG 1.21–0.50 (71%)attempts 20–17goals 2–1

  2. Hainsey – Liles15:57

    xG 0.53–0.57 (48%)attempts 14–24goals 0–0

  3. Harrison – Bellemore12:53

    xG 0.55–1.04 (35%)attempts 15–18goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CAR 3.2 xGFLA 4.1 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CARFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CAR's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CAR is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 25/100 · #874 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.76 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50CAR 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Florida Panthers win this game 66% of the time.

CAR winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (CAR − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).