Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Mar 14, 2014·Pepsi Center, Denver

Anaheim Ducks 6, Colorado Avalanche 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 62% of the time.

COL winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
ANA01361604633
COL11231709438

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 12:25COLJohn MitchellAssists: Gabriel Landeskog, Nate Guenin · Wrist, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P2 3:08ANADaniel WinnikAssists: Nick Bonino, Bryan Allen · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:21COLJamie McGinnPPAssists: Ryan O'Reilly, Nick Holden · Wrist, 0.24 xG1–2
  4. P2 7:47ANAKyle PalmieriAssists: Patrick Maroon, Ryan Getzlaf · Backhand, 0.08 xG2–2
  5. P2 8:34ANAKyle PalmieriAssists: Hampus Lindholm, Nick Bonino · Wrist, 0.36 xG3–2
  6. P2 9:40ANACorey PerryAssists: Teemu Selanne, Cam Fowler · Wrist, 0.04 xG4–2
  7. P2 11:53ANABen LovejoyGWGAssists: Cam Fowler, Ryan Getzlaf · Slap, 0.02 xG5–2
  8. P2 18:08COLJamie McGinnPPAssists: Erik Johnson, Ryan O'Reilly · Tip-in, 0.46 xG5–3
  9. P2 18:41COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: John Mitchell, Jan Hejda · Backhand, 0.06 xG5–4
  10. P2 19:11ANAMathieu PerreaultAssists: Jakob Silfverberg, Luca Sbisa · Tip-in, 0.17 xG6–4
Penalties (12)
  1. P1 8:11COLBrad Malone: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 15:12ANAHampus Lindholm: Hooking2 min
  3. P2 4:28ANALuca Sbisa: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P2 16:35ANABen Lovejoy: Slashing2 min · PPG
  5. P3 0:48COLGabriel Landeskog: Charging2 min
  6. P3 2:07ANAMathieu Perreault: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 2:07COLErik Johnson: Match penatly 10 minutes10 min
  8. P3 11:20ANAMathieu Perreault: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 14:31ANARyan Getzlaf: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 14:31COLPatrick Bordeleau: Game misconduct10 min
  11. P3 14:31ANAPatrick Maroon: Game misconduct10 min
  12. P3 0:00ANACorey Perry: Slashing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
48% to win52% to win
← ANA attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Mitchell won the faceoff against Koivu
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANACOL
33Shots on goal38
3.7Expected goals3.1
63Shot attempts67
36Faceoffs won34
4Power plays5
24Penalty minutes24
20Hits20
17Blocked shots16
0Giveaways9
9Takeaways13

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestBonino – Maroon – Palmieri6:30

    xG 0.91–0.30 (75%)attempts 13–7goals 1–1

  2. Beleskey – Perreault – Silfverberg7:40

    xG 0.29–0.10 (74%)attempts 6–7goals 1–0

  3. Koivu – Winnik – Cogliano8:25

    xG 0.05–0.26 (17%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  4. Selanne – Getzlaf – Perry11:38

    xG 0.20–0.47 (30%)attempts 11–10goals 2–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestAllen – Lindholm8:42

    xG 0.86–0.11 (89%)attempts 17–3goals 3–1

  2. Allen – Lovejoy3:01

    xG 0.17–0.14 (54%)attempts 2–4goals 0–0

  3. Beauchemin – Sbisa12:56

    xG 0.37–0.35 (52%)attempts 11–12goals 1–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestMcGinn – O'Reilly – Duchene9:24

    xG 0.41–0.24 (63%)attempts 9–9goals 0–2

  2. Mitchell – Landeskog – MacKinnon11:44

    xG 0.31–0.20 (61%)attempts 9–7goals 2–0

  3. Talbot – McLeod – Malone2:34

    xG 0.05–0.03 (64%)attempts 1–2goals 0–0

  4. Bordeleau – Carey – Malone2:21

    xG 0.00–0.27 (0%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHejda – Johnson12:51

    xG 0.53–0.20 (73%)attempts 13–12goals 1–2

  2. Guenin – Benoit9:21

    xG 0.33–0.69 (32%)attempts 5–17goals 1–1

  3. Holden – Barrie9:13

    xG 0.12–0.78 (13%)attempts 6–12goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 3.1 xGANA 3.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 91/100 · #87 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.93 · 10 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +23 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 62% of the time.

COL winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).