Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Mar 16, 2014·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Philadelphia Flyers 4, Pittsburgh Penguins 3

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 82% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
PHI31519011435
PIT1725011323

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:06PHIBrayden SchennAssists: Wayne Simmonds, Vincent Lecavalier · Backhand, 0.19 xG1–0
  2. P1 6:47PHIWayne SimmondsPPAssists: Kimmo Timonen, Claude Giroux · Tip-in, 0.23 xG2–0
  3. P1 13:41PHIWayne SimmondsPPAssists: Claude Giroux, Jakub Voracek · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–0
  4. P1 17:33PITBrooks OrpikAssists: Robert Bortuzzo, Joe Vitale · Slap, 0.02 xG3–1
  5. P2 5:50PITMatt NiskanenAssists: Rob Scuderi, Jussi Jokinen · Slap, 0.02 xG3–2
  6. P2 12:11PHIMatt ReadSHGWGAssists: Luke Schenn · Snap, 0.08 xG4–2
  7. P2 16:19PITJayson MegnaAssists: Brian Gibbons · Wrist, 0.21 xG4–3
Penalties (7)
  1. P1 4:58PITRobert Bortuzzo: Interference2 min · PPG
  2. P1 8:54PITEvgeni Malkin: Roughing2 min
  3. P1 12:47PITTaylor Pyatt: High sticking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 19:55PHIBrayden Schenn: Interference2 min
  5. P2 10:36PHISteve Downie: Roughing2 min
  6. P2 13:00PHIMichael Raffl: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 3:23PHIMatt Read: Holding2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

PHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
48% to win52% to win
← PHI attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Crosby won the faceoff against Giroux
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

PHIPIT
35Shots on goal23
4.3Expected goals2.2
59Shot attempts43
27Faceoffs won23
3Power plays4
8Penalty minutes6
25Hits28
11Blocked shots11
2Giveaways7
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestLecavalier – Simmonds – Schenn9:04

    xG 0.66–0.10 (87%)attempts 13–6goals 1–1

  2. Read – Couturier – Raffl2:37

    xG 0.17–0.12 (57%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Hartnell – Giroux – Voracek11:07

    xG 0.36–0.35 (50%)attempts 16–8goals 0–0

  4. Downie – Read – Couturier9:46

    xG 0.52–0.53 (49%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMacDonald – Schenn11:55

    xG 0.65–0.10 (87%)attempts 15–9goals 1–2

  2. Streit – Grossmann11:24

    xG 0.58–0.24 (71%)attempts 16–5goals 0–0

  3. Coburn – MacDonald3:33

    xG 0.19–0.02 (91%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestStempniak – Crosby – Gibbons3:59

    xG 0.31–0.20 (60%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Pyatt – Gibbons – Megna2:15

    xG 0.06–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  3. Jokinen – Malkin – Vitale10:26

    xG 0.35–0.43 (45%)attempts 11–7goals 2–0

  4. Stempniak – Crosby – Megna2:06

    xG 0.02–0.11 (16%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScuderi – Engelland5:16

    xG 0.27–0.04 (86%)attempts 5–3goals 1–0

  2. Engelland – Maatta5:52

    xG 0.48–0.28 (64%)attempts 3–9goals 0–0

  3. Orpik – Bortuzzo3:22

    xG 0.10–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.2 xGPHI 4.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITPHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it PHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 71/100 · #285 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.41 · 7 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
PHI 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +16 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 82% of the time.

PIT winsPHI wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − PHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).