Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 18, 2014·CONSOL Energy Center, Pittsburgh

Dallas Stars 1, Pittsburgh Penguins 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 65% of the time.

PIT winsDAL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
DAL18010015133
PIT21219211532

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:17PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Craig Adams · Backhand, 0.09 xG0–1
  2. P1 12:30DALTyler SeguinAssists: Trevor Daley · Tip-in, 0.04 xG1–1
  3. P1 15:25PITChris KunitzGWGAssists: Lee Stempniak · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–2
  4. P2 13:21PITLee StempniakAssists: Chris Kunitz, Sidney Crosby · Wrist, 0.22 xG1–3
  5. P3 1:56PITSidney CrosbyAssists: Lee Stempniak, Matt Niskanen · Wrist, 0.06 xG1–4
  6. P3 12:47PITBrandon SutterSHAssists: Brian Gibbons, Robert Bortuzzo · Backhand, 0.20 xG1–5
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 1:22DALCody Eakin: High sticking2 min
  2. P1 17:51PITChris Kunitz: Slashing2 min
  3. P2 19:31PITJoe Vitale: Slashing2 min
  4. P3 2:10DALRyan Garbutt: Hooking2 min
  5. P3 2:38DALCody Eakin: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  6. P3 2:38PITChris Kunitz: Roughing2 min
  7. P3 2:38PITChris Kunitz: Roughing2 min
  8. P3 2:38DALBrenden Dillon: Roughing2 min
  9. P3 10:52PITEvgeni Malkin: Tripping2 min
  10. P3 13:33DALRyan Garbutt: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  11. P3 18:16DALAntoine Roussel: Misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

DAL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PIT
48% to win52% to win
← DAL attackPIT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Seguin won the faceoff against Crosby
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

DALPIT
33Shots on goal32
2.0Expected goals2.9
59Shot attempts51
24Faceoffs won31
3Power plays3
20Penalty minutes10
15Hits26
8Blocked shots14
2Giveaways6
2Takeaways2

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Dallas Stars

Forward lines

  1. bestRoussel – Eakin – Garbutt9:36

    xG 0.36–0.10 (79%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  2. Benn – Chiasson – Seguin6:47

    xG 0.30–0.18 (62%)attempts 6–7goals 0–0

  3. Benn – Seguin – Nichushkin3:59

    xG 0.18–0.10 (65%)attempts 4–2goals 1–0

  4. Whitney – Mueller – Nichushkin6:23

    xG 0.12–0.07 (64%)attempts 8–4goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestGonchar – Connauton11:58

    xG 0.42–0.30 (59%)attempts 11–8goals 0–1

  2. Benn – Dillon16:20

    xG 0.48–0.60 (44%)attempts 16–9goals 0–1

  3. Daley – Goligoski14:06

    xG 0.42–1.03 (29%)attempts 10–22goals 1–2

Pittsburgh Penguins

Forward lines

  1. bestKunitz – Stempniak – Crosby8:24

    xG 0.75–0.23 (77%)attempts 12–8goals 3–1

  2. Jokinen – Malkin – Neal9:19

    xG 0.53–0.30 (64%)attempts 10–9goals 0–0

  3. Goc – Vitale – Gibbons2:00

    xG 0.03–0.00 (100%)attempts 1–0goals 0–0

  4. Adams – Sutter – Gibbons6:04

    xG 0.11–0.14 (45%)attempts 4–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestScuderi – Maatta13:49

    xG 0.54–0.38 (59%)attempts 11–16goals 1–0

  2. Bortuzzo – Despres13:06

    xG 0.25–0.35 (41%)attempts 10–10goals 1–0

  3. Orpik – Niskanen12:34

    xG 0.31–0.44 (42%)attempts 10–11goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PIT 2.9 xGDAL 2.0 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PITDAL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PIT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PIT is favoured, below it DAL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 28/100 · #815 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.95 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
DAL 100%5050%50PIT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Pittsburgh Penguins win this game 65% of the time.

PIT winsDAL wins

Simulated goal difference (PIT − DAL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).