Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 20, 2014·Rexall Place, Edmonton

Buffalo Sabres 3, Edmonton Oilers 1

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 52% of the time.

EDM winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF08116212336
EDM11401309136

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 17:48EDMTaylor HallPPAssists: Justin Schultz, David Perron · Slap, 0.10 xG0–1
  2. P2 9:16BUFCory ConacherPPAssists: Jamie McBain · Tip-in, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P3 1:09BUFCory ConacherGWGAssists: Cody Hodgson · Tip-in, 0.08 xG2–1
  4. P3 4:44BUFDrew StaffordAssists: Tyler Ennis, Cory Conacher · Snap, 0.17 xG3–1
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 4:43EDMLuke Gazdic: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 4:43BUFZenon Konopka: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 13:40BUFCory Conacher: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 13:40EDMBen Scrivens: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  5. P1 13:57BUFChristian Ehrhoff: Slashing2 min
  6. P1 16:48BUFTyler Ennis: High sticking2 min · PPG
  7. P2 2:06BUFMike Weber: Boarding2 min
  8. P2 4:09BUFTorrey Mitchell: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 7:56EDMTaylor Hall: Hooking2 min · PPG
  10. P2 12:52EDMRyan Smyth: Slashing2 min
  11. P2 16:14BUFMarcus Foligno: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 7:03BUFMike Weber: Fighting5 min
  13. P3 7:03EDMMatt Hendricks: Fighting5 min
  14. P3 13:18BUFCory Conacher: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
48% to win52% to win
← BUF attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Ennis won the faceoff against Gagner
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFEDM
36Shots on goal36
2.8Expected goals3.0
56Shot attempts67
35Faceoffs won34
2Power plays6
24Penalty minutes16
11Hits13
15Blocked shots13
5Giveaways13
5Takeaways6

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestStafford – Ennis – Foligno15:20

    xG 1.21–0.68 (64%)attempts 13–17goals 0–0

  2. Mitchell – Hodgson – Conacher10:32

    xG 0.22–0.22 (50%)attempts 12–8goals 1–0

  3. D'Agostini – Deslauriers – Flynn6:49

    xG 0.02–0.06 (23%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  4. Konopka – Ellis – Scott2:03

    xG 0.01–0.06 (17%)attempts 1–1goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEhrhoff – Ristolainen11:53

    xG 0.80–0.34 (70%)attempts 12–12goals 1–0

  2. Weber – McBain10:11

    xG 0.66–0.29 (69%)attempts 13–7goals 1–0

  3. Tallinder – Ruhwedel15:10

    xG 0.51–0.46 (52%)attempts 7–11goals 0–0

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestSmyth – Hendricks – Gordon7:09

    xG 0.08–0.02 (84%)attempts 4–2goals 0–0

  2. Lander – Pitlick – Nugent-Hopkins8:03

    xG 0.21–0.28 (43%)attempts 9–7goals 0–1

  3. Gagner – Perron – Hall16:12

    xG 0.56–1.37 (29%)attempts 13–21goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Ference – Schultz12:16

    xG 0.44–0.40 (52%)attempts 9–13goals 0–1

  2. Larsen – Klefbom3:40

    xG 0.11–0.15 (42%)attempts 2–2goals 0–0

  3. Fraser – Klefbom6:35

    xG 0.05–0.09 (34%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 3.0 xGBUF 2.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 28/100 · #813 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.12 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 26% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +24 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Edmonton Oilers win this game 52% of the time.

EDM winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).