Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Mar 21, 2014·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Nashville Predators 6, Calgary Flames 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 56% of the time.

CGY winsNSH wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
NSH262927622
CGY19310110529

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 5:10NSHVictor BartleyAssists: Craig Smith, Seth Jones · Slap, 0.05 xG1–0
  2. P1 5:59NSHShea WeberAssists: Mike Fisher, Matt Cullen · Wrist, 0.20 xG2–0
  3. P1 19:26CGYKris RussellPPAssists: Mark Giordano, Michael Cammalleri · Slap, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 4:10NSHPatric HornqvistAssists: Michael Del Zotto, Matt Cullen · Tip-in, 0.12 xG3–1
  5. P2 6:23CGYMichael CammalleriAssists: Kris Russell · Slap, 0.08 xG3–2
  6. P2 7:14CGYJiri HudlerAssists: Mark Giordano, Curtis Glencross · Tip-in, 0.19 xG3–3
  7. P2 8:06NSHViktor StalbergAssists: Gabriel Bourque, Calle Jarnkrok · Wrist, 0.27 xG4–3
  8. P2 13:31CGYMikael BacklundAssists: Lance Bouma, Brian McGrattan · Snap, 0.14 xG4–4
  9. P3 14:28NSHShea WeberPPAssists: Matt Cullen, Patric Hornqvist · Slap, 0.08 xG5–4
  10. P3 17:08NSHMatt CullenGWGAssists: Roman Josi, Patric Hornqvist · Tip-in, 0.19 xG6–4
  11. P3 17:36CGYMichael CammalleriAssists: Kris Russell, Mikael Backlund · Wrist, 0.01 xG6–5
Penalties (4)
  1. P1 16:55CGYKenny Agostino: Too many men on the ice2 min
  2. P1 19:06NSHColin Wilson: Holding the stick2 min · PPG
  3. P2 9:51NSHMattias Ekholm: Holding2 min
  4. P3 13:42CGYCurtis Glencross: Hooking2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

NSH00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
48% to win52% to win
← NSH attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Wilson won the faceoff against Monahan
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

NSHCGY
22Shots on goal29
1.9Expected goals2.3
38Shot attempts55
33Faceoffs won30
2Power plays2
4Penalty minutes4
15Hits26
10Blocked shots11
2Giveaways12
2Takeaways12

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. Cullen – Fisher – Hornqvist14:31

    xG 0.58–0.54 (52%)attempts 6–18goals 3–1

  2. Smith – Bourque – Jarnkrok12:55

    xG 0.13–0.26 (34%)attempts 8–8goals 1–0

  3. Nystrom – Stalberg – Wilson10:07

    xG 0.25–0.51 (33%)attempts 7–11goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Bartley – Jones7:19

    xG 0.13–0.09 (60%)attempts 7–2goals 1–0

  2. Ellis – Ekholm17:43

    xG 0.43–0.75 (37%)attempts 10–19goals 0–2

  3. Weber – Josi22:22

    xG 0.31–0.84 (27%)attempts 9–23goals 1–1

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. bestCammalleri – Byron – Backlund13:42

    xG 0.60–0.24 (71%)attempts 19–6goals 2–0

  2. Stajan – Hudler – Glencross14:17

    xG 0.69–0.53 (57%)attempts 15–7goals 1–3

  3. McGrattan – Galiardi – Bouma8:28

    xG 0.15–0.13 (54%)attempts 4–6goals 0–1

  4. Colborne – Agostino – Monahan12:00

    xG 0.18–0.72 (20%)attempts 5–10goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestGiordano – Brodie18:27

    xG 0.90–0.42 (68%)attempts 22–4goals 2–2

  2. Russell – Butler13:17

    xG 0.49–0.32 (60%)attempts 13–13goals 1–1

  3. Smid – Wotherspoon15:11

    xG 0.41–0.65 (39%)attempts 9–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 2.3 xGNSH 1.9 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYNSH

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it NSH. Dots are goals.

Excitement 94/100 · #56 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.09 · 11 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
NSH 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +29 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Calgary Flames win this game 56% of the time.

CGY winsNSH wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − NSH), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).