Skip to content
Ice Lab

Tue, Mar 25, 2014·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Colorado Avalanche 5, Nashville Predators 4 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 58% of the time.

NSH winsCOL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
COL1319213032528
NSH2131917041433

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 3:33NSHRoman JosiAssists: Gabriel Bourque, Craig Smith · Slap, 0.04 xG0–1
  2. P1 9:49NSHRoman JosiAssists: Calle Jarnkrok · Wrist, 0.02 xG0–2
  3. P1 19:06COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: Paul Stastny, Nathan MacKinnon · Wrist, 0.14 xG1–2
  4. P2 8:41COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: Paul Stastny · Wrist, 0.07 xG2–2
  5. P2 14:43NSHMatt CullenAssists: Ryan Ellis, Mike Fisher · Wrist, 0.16 xG2–3
  6. P3 12:25COLCody McLeodAssists: Matt Duchene, Andre Benoit · Backhand, 0.21 xG3–3
  7. P3 15:17NSHMatt CullenAssists: Patric Hornqvist, Ryan Ellis · Tip-in, 0.17 xG3–4
  8. P3 16:01COLNick HoldenAssists: Gabriel Landeskog, Tyson Barrie · Wrist, 0.10 xG4–4

Shootout

  1. 1. NSH Calle Jarnkrok scored
  2. 2. COL Matt Duchene stopped
  3. 3. NSH Ryan Ellis stopped
  4. 4. COL Ryan O'Reilly scored
  5. 5. NSH Roman Josi stopped
  6. 6. COL Gabriel Landeskog scored
Penalties (2)
  1. P2 3:22COLJan Hejda: Interference2 min
  2. P3 17:49COLNick Holden: High sticking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

COL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
48% to win52% to win
← COL attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Fisher won the faceoff against Stastny
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

COLNSH
28Shots on goal33
2.6Expected goals3.0
52Shot attempts61
38Faceoffs won33
0Power plays2
4Penalty minutes0
12Hits15
14Blocked shots10
6Giveaways7
9Takeaways17

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestStastny – McGinn – Landeskog10:19

    xG 0.98–0.47 (68%)attempts 16–6goals 1–2

  2. Talbot – McLeod – Cliche9:44

    xG 0.35–0.41 (46%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  3. Bordeleau – Carey – Malone6:30

    xG 0.01–0.08 (15%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  4. McGinn – O'Reilly – Duchene6:01

    xG 0.20–0.32 (38%)attempts 3–11goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestHolden – Barrie16:52

    xG 1.12–0.83 (58%)attempts 19–22goals 2–2

  2. Sarich – Benoit16:02

    xG 0.74–0.65 (53%)attempts 11–11goals 1–0

  3. Hejda – Johnson19:35

    xG 0.52–1.12 (32%)attempts 17–16goals 1–2

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestSmith – Bourque – Jarnkrok10:12

    xG 0.43–0.13 (77%)attempts 13–5goals 2–0

  2. Cullen – Fisher – Hornqvist14:10

    xG 1.26–0.99 (56%)attempts 17–18goals 2–1

  3. Clune – Stalberg – Sissons8:54

    xG 0.12–0.12 (50%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  4. Nystrom – Spaling – Wilson12:56

    xG 0.45–0.93 (32%)attempts 12–14goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeber – Josi19:17

    xG 1.15–0.37 (76%)attempts 31–13goals 2–0

  2. Ellis – Ekholm16:14

    xG 1.06–1.11 (49%)attempts 13–20goals 2–2

  3. Bartley – Del Zotto15:59

    xG 0.45–0.73 (38%)attempts 7–12goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.0 xGCOL 2.6 xG
0123P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCOL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it COL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 97/100 · #19 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.90 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 11% (winner's lowest chance)
COL 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 58% of the time.

NSH winsCOL wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − COL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).