Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 27, 2014·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Buffalo Sabres 1, Nashville Predators 6

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 72% of the time.

NSH winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF04115014133
NSH41516113634

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 6:26NSHColton SissonsAssists: Rich Clune, Eric Nystrom · Wrist, 0.18 xG0–1
  2. P1 11:44NSHColin WilsonGWGAssists: Viktor Stalberg, Nick Spaling · Snap, 0.22 xG0–2
  3. P1 11:53NSHCalle JarnkrokAssists: Gabriel Bourque, Craig Smith · Snap, 0.17 xG0–3
  4. P1 19:17NSHShea WeberPPAssists: Matt Cullen, Patric Hornqvist · Slap, 0.12 xG0–4
  5. P2 2:06BUFRasmus RistolainenAssists: Brian Flynn, Johan Larsson · Slap, 0.03 xG1–4
  6. P2 6:19NSHShea WeberAssists: Roman Josi, Mike Fisher · Slap, 0.02 xG1–5
  7. P3 19:20NSHEric NystromAssists: Rich Clune · Snap, 0.11 xG1–6
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 7:04BUFHenrik Tallinder: Hooking2 min
  2. P1 14:28BUFNicolas Deslauriers: Fighting5 min · PPG
  3. P1 14:28NSHVictor Bartley: Fighting5 min
  4. P1 17:39BUFCory Conacher: Too many men on the ice2 min
  5. P1 17:47BUFJohan Larsson: Delaying game2 min
  6. P2 12:37NSHMike Fisher: Tripping2 min
  7. P3 5:20NSHColin Wilson: Interference2 min
  8. P3 19:58NSHMichael Del Zotto: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P3 19:58NSHRich Clune: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  10. P3 19:58BUFNicolas Deslauriers: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
48% to win52% to win
← BUF attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Jarnkrok won the faceoff against Ennis
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFNSH
33Shots on goal34
1.8Expected goals3.1
58Shot attempts56
32Faceoffs won36
3Power plays3
13Penalty minutes13
13Hits6
12Blocked shots16
5Giveaways6
4Takeaways5

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestStafford – Scott – Ennis4:06

    xG 0.24–0.13 (64%)attempts 6–5goals 0–0

  2. D'Agostini – Hodgson – Deslauriers12:13

    xG 0.36–0.45 (44%)attempts 14–5goals 0–0

  3. Larsson – Conacher – Flynn12:05

    xG 0.33–0.79 (29%)attempts 8–17goals 1–2

  4. Stafford – Ennis – Foligno9:50

    xG 0.13–0.64 (17%)attempts 6–9goals 0–3

Defence pairs

  1. bestTallinder – Ruhwedel13:32

    xG 0.52–0.45 (54%)attempts 17–10goals 0–2

  2. Tallinder – McBain2:44

    xG 0.06–0.04 (62%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Ehrhoff – Ristolainen13:12

    xG 0.35–0.67 (34%)attempts 8–14goals 0–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestNystrom – Clune – Sissons11:36

    xG 0.72–0.17 (81%)attempts 14–6goals 2–0

  2. Stalberg – Spaling – Wilson10:15

    xG 0.71–0.35 (67%)attempts 15–12goals 1–1

  3. Smith – Bourque – Jarnkrok11:13

    xG 0.32–0.14 (70%)attempts 5–7goals 1–0

  4. Cullen – Fisher – Hornqvist10:58

    xG 0.44–0.60 (43%)attempts 9–15goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestWeber – Josi16:46

    xG 0.74–0.48 (61%)attempts 17–14goals 3–0

  2. Ellis – Ekholm17:21

    xG 0.65–0.41 (62%)attempts 15–15goals 0–0

  3. Bartley – Del Zotto13:14

    xG 0.73–0.55 (57%)attempts 9–18goals 2–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 3.1 xGBUF 1.8 xG
0123P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 13/100 · #1021 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.57 · 4 goals in reachComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 72% of the time.

NSH winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).