Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Mar 27, 2014·Pepsi Center, Denver

Vancouver Canucks 2, Colorado Avalanche 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 52% of the time.

COL winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
VAN11011001001231
COL181120711328

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 10:50VANYannick WeberPPAssists: Nicklas Jensen, Daniel Sedin · Wrist, 0.27 xG1–0
  2. P1 15:40COLMatt DucheneAssists: Andre Benoit, Cody McLeod · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P2 8:58COLGabriel LandeskogAssists: Paul Stastny, Cory Sarich · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–2
  4. P2 18:38VANZack KassianAssists: Dan Hamhuis, David Booth · Wrist, 0.12 xG2–2
  5. OT 0:55COLTyson BarrieGWGAssists: Matt Duchene, Ryan O'Reilly · Wrist, 0.19 xG2–3
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 3:12COLBrad Malone: Tripping2 min
  2. P1 10:00COLGabriel Landeskog: Boarding2 min · PPG
  3. P1 17:00COLTyson Barrie: Interference2 min
  4. P2 2:23COLPatrick Bordeleau: Fighting5 min
  5. P2 2:23VANTom Sestito: Fighting5 min
  6. P2 6:07VANNicklas Jensen: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 6:24COLAndre Benoit: Holding the stick2 min
  8. P2 9:49COLAndre Benoit: Hooking2 min
  9. P3 1:01VANShawn Matthias: Hooking2 min
  10. P3 5:46VANJannik Hansen: Interference2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0COL
48% to win52% to win
← VAN attackCOL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Kesler won the faceoff against Stastny
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCOL
31Shots on goal28
2.2Expected goals2.1
62Shot attempts48
31Faceoffs won30
5Power plays3
11Penalty minutes15
21Hits32
13Blocked shots20
5Giveaways9
15Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestRichardson – Booth – Kassian12:17

    xG 0.84–0.18 (83%)attempts 16–7goals 1–0

  2. Sedin – Hansen – Matthias11:28

    xG 0.22–0.08 (73%)attempts 9–5goals 0–0

  3. Sestito – Schroeder – Jensen2:46

    xG 0.01–0.03 (27%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  4. Higgins – Burrows – Kesler10:45

    xG 0.34–0.64 (35%)attempts 13–11goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEdler – Weber2:46

    xG 0.39–0.08 (84%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Edler – Garrison2:12

    xG 0.00–0.03 (0%)attempts 0–2goals 0–0

  3. Edler – Stanton3:00

    xG 0.16–0.24 (39%)attempts 7–2goals 0–0

Colorado Avalanche

Forward lines

  1. bestO'Reilly – Duchene – MacKinnon10:25

    xG 0.69–0.19 (78%)attempts 15–13goals 0–0

  2. Stastny – McGinn – Landeskog8:09

    xG 0.38–0.17 (69%)attempts 8–6goals 1–0

  3. Stastny – Landeskog – MacKinnon4:49

    xG 0.18–0.06 (74%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

  4. McGinn – O'Reilly – Duchene3:51

    xG 0.03–0.05 (37%)attempts 3–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestHejda – Johnson13:40

    xG 0.59–0.28 (67%)attempts 13–14goals 0–0

  2. Sarich – Benoit10:36

    xG 0.56–0.31 (65%)attempts 9–14goals 1–1

  3. Holden – Barrie9:32

    xG 0.48–0.47 (51%)attempts 11–9goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

COL 2.1 xGVAN 2.2 xG
00.511.52P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

COLVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

COL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line COL is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 49/100 · #575 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.56 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 36% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50COL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +26 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 52% of the time.

COL winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (COL − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).