Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Mar 28, 2014·Canadian Tire Centre, Ottawa

Chicago Blackhawks 3, Ottawa Senators 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 70% of the time.

OTT winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI014223112349
OTT21315211529

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 9:25OTTErik CondraSHAssists: Zack Smith · Wrist, 0.22 xG0–1
  2. P1 19:30OTTCody CeciAssists: Clarke MacArthur, Mark Stone · Tip-in, 0.02 xG0–2
  3. P2 0:23OTTMilan MichalekAssists: Jason Spezza, Ales Hemsky · Tip-in, 0.11 xG0–3
  4. P2 10:46CHIPatrick SharpPPAssists: Jonathan Toews, Antti Raanta · Tip-in, 0.25 xG1–3
  5. P2 19:19CHIMarian HossaUnassisted · Backhand, 0.10 xG2–3
  6. P3 6:00OTTKyle TurrisPPGWGAssists: Clarke MacArthur, Patrick Wiercioch · Wrist, 0.42 xG2–4
  7. P3 10:54OTTClarke MacArthurAssists: Mark Stone · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–5
  8. P3 17:00CHIBrent SeabrookSHAssists: Michal Handzus, Peter Regin · Slap, 0.06 xG3–5
Penalties (13)
  1. P1 9:06OTTClarke MacArthur: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  2. P1 12:57OTTChris Neil: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 12:57CHIBrandon Bollig: Fighting5 min
  4. P2 0:54OTTChris Neil: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  5. P2 9:56OTTJared Cowen: High sticking2 min · PPG
  6. P3 5:09CHIMatt Carey: Delaying game face off violation2 min · PPG
  7. P3 11:57OTTJared Cowen: Interference2 min
  8. P3 13:23OTTEric Gryba: Slashing2 min
  9. P3 14:33CHIAndrew Shaw: Roughing2 min
  10. P3 14:33CHIAndrew Shaw: Spearing5 min
  11. P3 14:33CHIAndrew Shaw: Game misconduct10 min
  12. P3 14:33OTTZack Smith: Slashing2 min
  13. P3 14:33OTTZack Smith: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0OTT
48% to win52% to win
← CHI attackOTT attack →
  1. P1 20:00Spezza won the faceoff against Toews
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHIOTT
49Shots on goal29
4.3Expected goals3.0
73Shot attempts56
44Faceoffs won21
6Power plays2
24Penalty minutes19
22Hits38
17Blocked shots16
11Giveaways14
10Takeaways10

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestSmith – Kruger – Bollig8:56

    xG 0.63–0.15 (81%)attempts 12–7goals 0–0

  2. Hossa – Versteeg – Toews5:43

    xG 0.36–0.16 (70%)attempts 4–4goals 0–0

  3. Handzus – Sharp – Shaw3:10

    xG 0.10–0.01 (91%)attempts 8–1goals 0–0

  4. Handzus – Hossa – Sharp7:48

    xG 0.25–0.25 (51%)attempts 6–5goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrookbank – Leddy12:37

    xG 1.17–0.15 (89%)attempts 22–3goals 0–0

  2. Keith – Seabrook15:51

    xG 1.10–1.05 (51%)attempts 17–18goals 0–2

  3. Oduya – Hjalmarsson12:09

    xG 0.27–0.48 (36%)attempts 9–15goals 0–0

Ottawa Senators

Forward lines

  1. bestMacArthur – Turris – Stone13:00

    xG 1.02–0.72 (59%)attempts 16–10goals 2–0

  2. Spezza – Hemsky – Michalek13:41

    xG 0.75–0.96 (44%)attempts 15–16goals 1–1

  3. Condra – Hoffman – Zibanejad6:20

    xG 0.10–0.31 (24%)attempts 7–7goals 0–0

  4. Neil – Greening – Smith7:10

    xG 0.02–0.58 (3%)attempts 3–16goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMethot – Karlsson18:06

    xG 1.54–0.57 (73%)attempts 18–18goals 2–1

  2. Gryba – Cowen12:33

    xG 0.27–0.43 (39%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0

  3. Wiercioch – Ceci11:04

    xG 0.19–0.98 (16%)attempts 11–14goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

OTT 3.0 xGCHI 4.3 xG
012345P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

OTTCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

OTT's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line OTT is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 76/100 · #240 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.95 · 8 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 52% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50OTT 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +19 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 70% of the time.

OTT winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (OTT − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).