Skip to content
Ice Lab

Fri, Mar 28, 2014·Rexall Place, Edmonton

Anaheim Ducks 3, Edmonton Oilers 4 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 96% of the time.

EDM winsANA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
ANA11211611607351
EDM15171813423

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 0:35ANANick BoninoAssists: Ryan Getzlaf, Sami Vatanen · Snap, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P1 4:43EDMSam GagnerAssists: David Perron, Taylor Hall · Backhand, 0.16 xG1–1
  3. P2 10:22EDMJordan EberleAssists: Ryan Nugent-Hopkins, Martin Marincin · Snap, 0.11 xG1–2
  4. P2 15:23ANAPatrick MaroonAssists: Mathieu Perreault, Stephane Robidas · Wrist, 0.09 xG2–2
  5. P3 8:26EDMOscar KlefbomAssists: David Perron, Justin Schultz · Snap, 0.10 xG2–3
  6. P3 15:30ANAMathieu PerreaultAssists: Patrick Maroon, Teemu Selanne · Wrist, 0.18 xG3–3
  7. OT 3:51EDMAndrew FerenceGWGAssists: David Perron · Slap, 0.00 xG3–4
Penalties (14)
  1. P1 1:04EDMMatt Hendricks: Fighting5 min
  2. P1 1:04ANADaniel Winnik: Fighting5 min
  3. P1 1:04EDMMatt Hendricks: Roughing2 min
  4. P1 12:18EDMDavid Perron: Roughing2 min
  5. P1 12:18ANAStephane Robidas: Boarding2 min
  6. P1 15:24EDMMatt Hendricks: Tripping2 min
  7. P2 16:02ANACorey Perry: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 16:02EDMTaylor Hall: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  9. P2 18:48EDMMatt Hendricks: Fighting5 min
  10. P2 18:48ANAMatt Beleskey: Fighting5 min
  11. P3 0:43ANAStephane Robidas: Interference2 min
  12. OT 0:21EDMAndrew Ference: Hooking2 min
  13. OT 2:00EDMJeff Petry: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  14. OT 2:39ANAMathieu Perreault: Tripping2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

ANA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0EDM
48% to win52% to win
← ANA attackEDM attack →
  1. P1 20:00Getzlaf won the faceoff against Gagner
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

ANAEDM
51Shots on goal23
5.2Expected goals1.2
82Shot attempts37
33Faceoffs won39
4Power plays1
18Penalty minutes22
17Hits24
8Blocked shots15
10Giveaways19
3Takeaways8

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Anaheim Ducks

Forward lines

  1. bestSelanne – Perreault – Maroon9:32

    xG 1.30–0.21 (86%)attempts 13–5goals 2–0

  2. Getzlaf – Perry – Bonino16:11

    xG 1.02–0.33 (76%)attempts 20–9goals 1–0

  3. Beleskey – Silfverberg – Rakell5:31

    xG 0.52–0.21 (72%)attempts 10–4goals 0–1

  4. Cogliano – Silfverberg – Rakell2:59

    xG 0.23–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBeauchemin – Vatanen18:39

    xG 1.47–0.20 (88%)attempts 25–10goals 2–0

  2. Robidas – Sbisa13:30

    xG 0.95–0.25 (79%)attempts 18–5goals 1–1

  3. Lovejoy – Lindholm12:04

    xG 0.86–0.49 (64%)attempts 13–7goals 0–2

Edmonton Oilers

Forward lines

  1. bestEberle – Lander – Nugent-Hopkins3:35

    xG 0.15–0.05 (77%)attempts 2–1goals 0–0

  2. Smyth – Hendricks – Gordon3:43

    xG 0.03–0.09 (27%)attempts 2–7goals 0–0

  3. Gagner – Perron – Hall5:41

    xG 0.16–0.39 (29%)attempts 3–6goals 1–1

  4. Eberle – Hall – Nugent-Hopkins9:47

    xG 0.31–0.56 (35%)attempts 9–8goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Marincin – Belov9:41

    xG 0.33–0.50 (40%)attempts 8–9goals 1–0

  2. Petry – Marincin2:22

    xG 0.00–0.29 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  3. Ference – Schultz2:38

    xG 0.08–0.49 (14%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

EDM 1.2 xGANA 5.2 xG
0123456P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

EDMANA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

EDM's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line EDM is favoured, below it ANA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 83/100 · #165 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.17 · 7 goals in reachComeback index 38% (winner's lowest chance)
ANA 100%5050%50EDM 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +40 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Anaheim Ducks win this game 96% of the time.

EDM winsANA wins

Simulated goal difference (EDM − ANA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).