Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 6, 2014·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Buffalo Sabres 2, Philadelphia Flyers 5

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 82% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
BUF050628219
PHI11431518537

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 13:30PHIMatt ReadAssists: Mark Streit · Snap, 0.02 xG0–1
  2. P2 7:40PHIZac RinaldoAssists: Matt Read, Mark Streit · Snap, 0.07 xG0–2
  3. P2 14:20PHIBrayden SchennPPGWGAssists: Mark Streit, Vincent Lecavalier · Tip-in, 0.15 xG0–3
  4. P2 17:58PHIVincent LecavalierAssists: Jakub Voracek, Steve Mason · Snap, 0.04 xG0–4
  5. P3 7:26BUFCody HodgsonPPAssists: Christian Ehrhoff, Tyler Ennis · Tip-in, 0.11 xG1–4
  6. P3 15:10PHIBrayden SchennAssists: Wayne Simmonds, Kimmo Timonen · Snap, 0.01 xG1–5
  7. P3 17:48BUFMike WeberAssists: Cody Hodgson, Matt D'Agostini · Wrist, 0.25 xG2–5
Penalties (9)
  1. P1 3:33BUFChristian Ehrhoff: Slashing2 min
  2. P1 8:17PHIZac Rinaldo: Interference goalkeeper2 min
  3. P1 18:30BUFJohan Larsson: Interference2 min
  4. P1 19:50PHISean Couturier: Interference2 min
  5. P2 10:20BUFJamie McBain: Interference2 min
  6. P2 12:57BUFJamie McBain: Tripping2 min · PPG
  7. P2 15:16PHIZac Rinaldo: Charging2 min
  8. P2 19:14PHIZac Rinaldo: Tripping2 min
  9. P3 4:29PHIZac Rinaldo: Match penatly 10 minutes10 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

BUF00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
48% to win52% to win
← BUF attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Giroux won the faceoff against Ennis
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

BUFPHI
19Shots on goal37
1.7Expected goals3.8
45Shot attempts74
30Faceoffs won30
6Power plays4
8Penalty minutes18
26Hits25
20Blocked shots14
5Giveaways13
4Takeaways4

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Buffalo Sabres

Forward lines

  1. bestEllis – Hodgson – Girgensons2:47

    xG 0.14–0.07 (68%)attempts 5–4goals 0–0

  2. Adam – Deslauriers – Larsson7:27

    xG 0.13–0.08 (61%)attempts 6–2goals 0–0

  3. D'Agostini – Hodgson – Girgensons5:00

    xG 0.01–0.20 (4%)attempts 2–7goals 0–1

  4. Ellis – Scott – Flynn4:01

    xG 0.04–0.32 (10%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Ehrhoff – Ristolainen11:40

    xG 0.26–0.34 (43%)attempts 10–12goals 0–0

  2. Ehrhoff – McBain2:16

    xG 0.00–0.14 (0%)attempts 1–4goals 0–1

  3. Weber – McCabe4:22

    xG 0.03–0.43 (6%)attempts 2–10goals 0–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestHartnell – Giroux – Voracek7:39

    xG 0.56–0.08 (87%)attempts 11–4goals 0–0

  2. Rinaldo – Read – Couturier5:02

    xG 0.41–0.01 (98%)attempts 10–2goals 2–0

  3. Lecavalier – Hall – Rosehill5:47

    xG 0.28–0.07 (79%)attempts 9–4goals 0–0

  4. Simmonds – Schenn – Raffl6:44

    xG 0.16–0.11 (60%)attempts 8–5goals 1–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestMacDonald – Schenn12:40

    xG 0.49–0.09 (84%)attempts 14–9goals 0–0

  2. Timonen – Coburn8:57

    xG 0.56–0.18 (76%)attempts 17–7goals 1–0

  3. Streit – Grossmann12:30

    xG 0.50–0.18 (74%)attempts 15–7goals 2–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 3.8 xGBUF 1.7 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHIBUF

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it BUF. Dots are goals.

Excitement 22/100 · #905 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.60 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 51% (winner's lowest chance)
BUF 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +21 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 82% of the time.

PHI winsBUF wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − BUF), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).