Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 6, 2014·United Center, Chicago

St. Louis Blues 2, Chicago Blackhawks 4

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 90% of the time.

CHI winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
STL1308112223
CHI011212212435

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 1:57STLJaden SchwartzPPAssists: Brenden Morrow, Alex Pietrangelo · Wrist, 0.10 xG1–0
  2. P2 8:34CHIJeremy MorinAssists: Bryan Bickell · Wrist, 0.32 xG1–1
  3. P2 19:33CHIPatrick SharpAssists: Jeremy Morin, Andrew Shaw · Slap, 0.06 xG1–2
  4. P3 0:56CHIMarcus KrugerGWGAssists: Joakim Nordstrom · Wrist, 0.12 xG1–3
  5. P3 17:58STLVladimir SobotkaAssists: David Backes, Jay Bouwmeester · Wrist, 0.04 xG2–3
  6. P3 19:56CHIBen SmithENAssists: Kris Versteeg · Backhand, 0.65 xG2–4
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 1:45CHIAndrew Shaw: Cross checking2 min · PPG
  2. P1 3:11STLRyan Reaves: Slashing2 min
  3. P1 10:14STLDavid Backes: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 17:49CHIPatrick Sharp: Hooking2 min
  5. P1 19:52STLCarlo Colaiacovo: Hooking2 min
  6. P2 1:13CHIBrent Seabrook: Interference2 min
  7. P2 8:40STLRyan Reaves: Fighting5 min
  8. P2 8:40CHIBrandon Bollig: Fighting5 min
  9. P2 12:23CHIDuncan Keith: Hooking2 min
  10. P2 12:23STLDerek Roy: Diving2 min
  11. P3 2:05STLRoman Polak: Delaying game puck over glass2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CHI
48% to win52% to win
← STL attackCHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backes won the faceoff against Kruger
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLCHI
23Shots on goal35
1.4Expected goals4.1
38Shot attempts60
31Faceoffs won26
3Power plays4
15Penalty minutes13
40Hits23
15Blocked shots8
6Giveaways9
3Takeaways1

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. Morrow – Sobotka – Paajarvi5:51

    xG 0.01–0.03 (27%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

  2. Lapierre – Porter – Reaves4:54

    xG 0.03–0.30 (8%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0

  3. Roy – Oshie – Berglund9:46

    xG 0.10–0.55 (15%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

  4. Ott – Backes – Schwartz6:57

    xG 0.16–0.85 (16%)attempts 3–9goals 0–1

Defence pairs

  1. Jackman – Polak12:43

    xG 0.13–0.25 (34%)attempts 6–10goals 0–0

  2. Colaiacovo – Shattenkirk11:57

    xG 0.24–0.38 (39%)attempts 7–6goals 0–0

  3. Bouwmeester – Pietrangelo14:38

    xG 0.40–0.90 (31%)attempts 16–17goals 1–0

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestKruger – Bollig – Nordstrom5:44

    xG 1.00–0.06 (95%)attempts 8–2goals 1–0

  2. Bickell – Regin – Morin6:58

    xG 0.72–0.06 (92%)attempts 10–3goals 1–0

  3. Hossa – Sharp – Shaw10:06

    xG 0.21–0.20 (52%)attempts 12–10goals 0–1

  4. Handzus – Versteeg – Smith9:33

    xG 0.09–0.14 (41%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestBrookbank – Hjalmarsson13:42

    xG 1.35–0.29 (82%)attempts 15–11goals 3–1

  2. Keith – Seabrook14:36

    xG 0.57–0.15 (79%)attempts 15–10goals 0–0

  3. Rozsival – Leddy12:46

    xG 0.80–0.59 (57%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CHI 4.1 xGSTL 1.4 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CHISTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CHI is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 43/100 · #641 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.10 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 31% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50CHI 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +27 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Chicago Blackhawks win this game 90% of the time.

CHI winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (CHI − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).