Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sat, Apr 12, 2014·Bridgestone Arena, Nashville

Chicago Blackhawks 5, Nashville Predators 7

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 89% of the time.

NSH winsCHI wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
CHI2716212525
NSH14113516733

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 4:11CHIBen SmithAssists: Brandon Saad · Wrist, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P1 12:43CHIMarian HossaUnassisted · Wrap-around, 0.07 xG2–0
  3. P1 12:57NSHCraig SmithAssists: Paul Gaustad · Wrist, 0.06 xG2–1
  4. P2 6:32NSHRyan EllisAssists: Mike Fisher, Patric Hornqvist · Snap, 0.14 xG2–2
  5. P2 13:16CHIMatt CareyAssists: Bryan Bickell, Brandon Saad · Wrist, 0.10 xG3–2
  6. P3 4:03NSHMatt CullenAssists: Mike Fisher, Mattias Ekholm · Wrist, 0.29 xG3–3
  7. P3 7:05NSHColin WilsonAssists: Nick Spaling, Shea Weber · Wrist, 0.25 xG3–4
  8. P3 8:00CHIJeremy MorinAssists: Johnny Oduya, Andrew Shaw · Wrist, 0.03 xG4–4
  9. P3 17:05NSHPaul GaustadAssists: Craig Smith, Gabriel Bourque · Snap, 0.22 xG4–5
  10. P3 18:25CHIAndrew ShawUnassisted · Slap, 0.06 xG5–5
  11. P3 19:01NSHPatric HornqvistGWGAssists: Matt Cullen, Mike Fisher · Tip-in, 0.15 xG5–6
  12. P3 19:46NSHShea WeberENAssists: Roman Josi, Paul Gaustad · Wrist, 0.40 xG5–7
Penalties (5)
  1. P2 3:12NSHRyan Ellis: Tripping2 min
  2. P2 7:04CHIMichal Rozsival: Cross checking2 min
  3. P2 10:39NSHSeth Jones: Tripping2 min
  4. P2 16:02CHIKris Versteeg: Cross checking2 min
  5. P3 11:18CHIBryan Bickell: Too many men on the ice2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CHI00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0NSH
48% to win52% to win
← CHI attackNSH attack →
  1. P1 20:00Shaw won the faceoff against Jarnkrok
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CHINSH
25Shots on goal33
1.5Expected goals4.2
48Shot attempts50
26Faceoffs won37
2Power plays3
6Penalty minutes4
11Hits21
9Blocked shots15
10Giveaways9
14Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Chicago Blackhawks

Forward lines

  1. bestBickell – Regin – Morin7:26

    xG 0.19–0.00 (100%)attempts 8–2goals 0–0

  2. Hossa – Sharp – Shaw3:40

    xG 0.08–0.00 (100%)attempts 4–0goals 1–0

  3. Smith – Bollig – Nordstrom4:07

    xG 0.22–0.18 (56%)attempts 3–5goals 0–0

  4. Versteeg – Smith – Saad4:59

    xG 0.15–0.14 (51%)attempts 6–3goals 1–1

Defence pairs

  1. Brookbank – Seabrook14:37

    xG 0.27–0.56 (32%)attempts 12–9goals 0–1

  2. Leddy – Rundblad12:03

    xG 0.60–0.99 (38%)attempts 13–11goals 1–4

  3. Rozsival – Oduya17:45

    xG 0.20–0.79 (20%)attempts 12–13goals 2–1

Nashville Predators

Forward lines

  1. bestGaustad – Smith – Bourque6:46

    xG 0.68–0.05 (93%)attempts 7–3goals 2–0

  2. Cullen – Fisher – Hornqvist11:56

    xG 0.78–0.17 (82%)attempts 10–11goals 2–1

  3. Stalberg – Spaling – Wilson8:26

    xG 0.40–0.37 (52%)attempts 7–6goals 1–0

  4. Gaustad – Nystrom – Clune4:06

    xG 0.00–0.08 (0%)attempts 1–3goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestEllis – Ekholm13:13

    xG 1.14–0.52 (69%)attempts 11–12goals 4–1

  2. Weber – Josi20:22

    xG 0.91–0.51 (64%)attempts 12–21goals 2–3

  3. Del Zotto – Jones12:18

    xG 0.32–0.20 (62%)attempts 9–7goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

NSH 4.2 xGCHI 1.5 xG
01234P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

NSHCHI

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

NSH's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line NSH is favoured, below it CHI. Dots are goals.

Excitement 100/100 · #3 of 1230 this seasonSwing 3.44 · 12 goals in reach · 2-goal lead cutComeback index 21% (winner's lowest chance)
CHI 100%5050%50NSH 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +48 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Nashville Predators win this game 89% of the time.

NSH winsCHI wins

Simulated goal difference (NSH − CHI), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).