Skip to content
Ice Lab

Sun, Apr 13, 2014·Wells Fargo Center, Philadelphia

Carolina Hurricanes 6, Philadelphia Flyers 5 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 61% of the time.

PHI winsCAR wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
CAR31311219041638
PHI111311118040544

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 2:07CARJeff SkinnerAssists: Riley Nash, Mike Komisarek · Slap, 0.11 xG1–0
  2. P1 8:31CAREric StaalAssists: Jiri Tlusty, Justin Faulk · Wrist, 0.03 xG2–0
  3. P1 9:51PHIMatt ReadAssists: Jason Akeson, Mark Streit · Snap, 0.14 xG2–1
  4. P1 12:32CARManny MalhotraAssists: Mike Komisarek · Wrist, 0.09 xG3–1
  5. P2 0:17CAREric StaalAssists: Jiri Tlusty, Justin Faulk · Wrist, 0.01 xG4–1
  6. P2 12:00PHIKimmo TimonenPPAssists: Claude Giroux, Jakub Voracek · Slap, 0.04 xG4–2
  7. P2 12:10PHIWayne SimmondsAssists: Tye McGinn · Snap, 0.06 xG4–3
  8. P2 15:32PHISean CouturierUnassisted · Wrist, 0.20 xG4–4
  9. P3 15:39CARJeff SkinnerPPAssists: Andrei Loktionov, Elias Lindholm · Wrist, 0.40 xG5–4
  10. P3 19:50PHIWayne SimmondsAssists: Mark Streit, Kimmo Timonen · Wrist, 0.44 xG5–5

Shootout

  1. 1. PHI Jason Akeson stopped
  2. 2. CAR Eric Staal scored
  3. 3. PHI Claude Giroux stopped
  4. 4. CAR Jeff Skinner stopped
  5. 5. PHI Sean Couturier stopped
Penalties (7)
  1. P2 9:01PHIBrayden Schenn: Holding2 min
  2. P2 11:16CARRon Hainsey: Hooking2 min · PPG
  3. P2 16:51PHIMark Streit: Tripping2 min
  4. P3 13:09CARBrett Bellemore: Slashing2 min
  5. P3 13:09CARRon Hainsey: Roughing2 min
  6. P3 13:09PHIScott Hartnell: Spearing5 min · PPG
  7. P3 13:09PHIScott Hartnell: Game misconduct10 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

CAR00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0PHI
48% to win52% to win
← CAR attackPHI attack →
  1. P1 20:00Staal won the faceoff against Couturier
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

CARPHI
38Shots on goal44
3.6Expected goals4.4
66Shot attempts76
38Faceoffs won23
4Power plays2
6Penalty minutes19
13Hits17
17Blocked shots19
10Giveaways9
8Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Carolina Hurricanes

Forward lines

  1. bestDvorak – Malhotra – Bowman7:33

    xG 0.23–0.10 (69%)attempts 7–5goals 1–0

  2. Dwyer – Gerbe – Staal11:41

    xG 0.35–0.41 (46%)attempts 12–15goals 0–0

  3. Nash – Skinner – Lindholm8:41

    xG 0.29–0.52 (36%)attempts 6–8goals 1–2

  4. Staal – Tlusty – Loktionov10:58

    xG 0.37–0.93 (29%)attempts 12–12goals 2–1

Defence pairs

  1. bestKomisarek – Harrison14:10

    xG 0.68–0.54 (56%)attempts 14–12goals 2–0

  2. Liles – Faulk13:15

    xG 0.39–0.59 (40%)attempts 12–14goals 1–2

  3. Hainsey – Bellemore16:47

    xG 0.38–0.90 (30%)attempts 11–21goals 1–1

Philadelphia Flyers

Forward lines

  1. bestAkeson – Read – Couturier9:14

    xG 0.89–0.16 (85%)attempts 13–6goals 2–1

  2. Hartnell – Giroux – Voracek11:51

    xG 1.27–0.56 (69%)attempts 18–14goals 0–1

  3. Simmonds – Schenn – McGinn11:53

    xG 0.22–0.34 (40%)attempts 11–7goals 1–0

  4. Lecavalier – Hall – Rosehill8:00

    xG 0.08–0.28 (22%)attempts 4–7goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestSchenn – Gustafsson15:53

    xG 1.20–0.78 (60%)attempts 23–15goals 1–2

  2. Timonen – Coburn11:55

    xG 0.45–0.33 (57%)attempts 12–8goals 0–2

  3. Gill – Streit17:22

    xG 0.24–0.48 (34%)attempts 13–15goals 1–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

PHI 4.4 xGCAR 3.6 xG
012345P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

PHICAR

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

PHI's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line PHI is favoured, below it CAR. Dots are goals.

Excitement 100/100 · #1 of 1230 this seasonSwing 2.79 · 10 goals in reach · 3-goal lead cutComeback index 47% (winner's lowest chance)
CAR 100%5050%50PHI 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +46 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Philadelphia Flyers win this game 61% of the time.

PHI winsCAR wins

Simulated goal difference (PHI − CAR), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).