Skip to content
Ice Lab

Wed, Oct 8, 2014·Scotiabank Saddledome, Calgary

Vancouver Canucks 4, Calgary Flames 2

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 64% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3Total
VAN11321317433
CGY092709225

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P1 11:55VANAlexandre BurrowsPPAssists: Dan Hamhuis, Chris Tanev · Tip-in, 0.13 xG1–0
  2. P2 4:08CGYPaul ByronAssists: Joe Colborne · Wrist, 0.05 xG1–1
  3. P2 5:16VANZack KassianAssists: Linden Vey, Brad Richardson · Slap, 0.16 xG2–1
  4. P2 11:07VANRadim VrbataGWGAssists: Henrik Sedin, Daniel Sedin · Tip-in, 0.09 xG3–1
  5. P2 13:19CGYJiri HudlerAssists: Sean Monahan, Mark Giordano · Snap, 0.11 xG3–2
  6. P3 18:44VANHenrik SedinENAssists: Chris Tanev, Brad Richardson · Backhand, 0.67 xG4–2
Penalties (11)
  1. P1 3:34VANKevin Bieksa: Interference2 min
  2. P1 4:31VANChris Higgins: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  3. P1 11:47CGYPaul Byron: Hooking2 min · PPG
  4. P1 16:32CGYMason Raymond: Tripping2 min
  5. P1 19:42VANZack Kassian: Interference2 min
  6. P2 6:57VANBrad Richardson: High sticking2 min
  7. P2 7:25CGYCurtis Glencross: High sticking2 min
  8. P2 19:58VANKevin Bieksa: Roughing2 min
  9. P2 19:58VANAlexandre Burrows: Roughing2 min
  10. P2 19:58CGYDeryk Engelland: Roughing2 min
  11. P2 19:58CGYMikael Backlund: Roughing2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

VAN00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0CGY
46% to win54% to win
← VAN attackCGY attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backlund won the faceoff against Sedin
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

VANCGY
33Shots on goal25
2.6Expected goals1.8
50Shot attempts45
27Faceoffs won43
3Power plays4
12Penalty minutes10
16Hits32
13Blocked shots11
7Giveaways8
4Takeaways7

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against. Shift data for this game is incomplete, so treat these as rough.

Vancouver Canucks

Forward lines

  1. bestRichardson – Kassian – Vey5:16

    xG 0.63–0.02 (96%)attempts 10–2goals 1–0

  2. Higgins – Burrows – Bonino7:10

    xG 0.14–0.04 (77%)attempts 6–1goals 0–0

  3. Sedin – Sedin – Vrbata8:25

    xG 0.25–0.18 (58%)attempts 5–9goals 1–0

  4. Hansen – Dorsett – Matthias4:25

    xG 0.00–0.31 (0%)attempts 2–6goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestBieksa – Stanton8:28

    xG 0.36–0.12 (75%)attempts 6–5goals 2–0

  2. Hamhuis – Sbisa7:29

    xG 0.24–0.18 (57%)attempts 5–7goals 0–0

  3. Edler – Tanev8:59

    xG 0.24–0.25 (49%)attempts 10–5goals 0–2

Calgary Flames

Forward lines

  1. Hudler – Glencross – Monahan5:00

    xG 0.17–0.14 (55%)attempts 4–3goals 1–0

  2. McGrattan – Stajan – Bollig3:36

    xG 0.09–0.08 (55%)attempts 1–5goals 0–0

  3. Byron – Colborne – Gaudreau4:21

    xG 0.08–0.11 (41%)attempts 3–4goals 1–0

  4. Raymond – Backlund – Bouma4:47

    xG 0.09–0.34 (21%)attempts 3–4goals 0–2

Defence pairs

  1. bestGiordano – Brodie10:20

    xG 0.32–0.12 (72%)attempts 11–3goals 1–1

  2. Engelland – Russell7:32

    xG 0.12–0.29 (29%)attempts 4–9goals 1–0

  3. Wideman – Smid7:14

    xG 0.14–0.70 (16%)attempts 3–13goals 0–1

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

CGY 1.8 xGVAN 2.6 xG
00.511.522.5P1P2P3EndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

CGYVAN

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

CGY's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line CGY is favoured, below it VAN. Dots are goals.

Excitement 48/100 · #590 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.45 · 6 goals in reachComeback index 45% (winner's lowest chance)
VAN 100%5050%50CGY 100%P1P2P3EndBiggest swing +20 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Vancouver Canucks win this game 64% of the time.

CGY winsVAN wins

Simulated goal difference (CGY − VAN), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).