Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 9, 2014·Amalie Arena, Tampa

Florida Panthers 2, Tampa Bay Lightning 3 (OT)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 78% of the time.

TBL winsFLA wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTTotal
FLA03191900221
TBL081911312332

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. P2 5:03FLAErik GudbransonAssists: Dylan Olsen, Derek MacKenzie · Slap, 0.03 xG1–0
  2. P2 7:12TBLTyler JohnsonPPAssists: Valtteri Filppula, Anton Stralman · Wrist, 0.11 xG1–1
  3. P3 7:17TBLRyan CallahanPPAssists: Valtteri Filppula, Victor Hedman · Backhand, 0.42 xG1–2
  4. P3 9:16FLAJonathan HuberdeauAssists: Brian Campbell, Aaron Ekblad · Wrist, 0.17 xG2–2
  5. OT 1:11TBLVictor HedmanPPGWGAssists: Ben Bishop · Snap, 0.07 xG2–3
Penalties (15)
  1. P1 5:30FLADave Bolland: Cross checking2 min
  2. P1 11:20FLAJussi Jokinen: Hooking2 min
  3. P1 13:41TBLNikita Kucherov: Slashing2 min
  4. P1 13:41FLAJussi Jokinen: Cross checking2 min
  5. P2 5:34FLASean Bergenheim: Interference2 min · PPG
  6. P2 11:02TBLOndrej Palat: Roughing2 min
  7. P2 11:02FLAShawn Thornton: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 13:31TBLSteven Stamkos: High sticking2 min
  9. P2 13:31FLAErik Gudbranson: Unsportsmanlike conduct2 min
  10. P2 17:06FLAErik Gudbranson: Boarding2 min
  11. P3 2:39TBLBrett Connolly: Tripping2 min
  12. P3 5:23FLAScottie Upshall: Hooking2 min · PPG
  13. P3 6:18FLADylan Olsen: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  14. P3 13:42TBLRadko Gudas: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  15. P3 0:00FLAScottie Upshall: Interference goalkeeper2 min · PPG

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

FLA00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0TBL
46% to win54% to win
← FLA attackTBL attack →
  1. P1 20:00Barkov won the faceoff against Stamkos
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

FLATBL
21Shots on goal32
1.3Expected goals2.8
36Shot attempts57
31Faceoffs won36
2Power plays7
20Penalty minutes10
21Hits28
13Blocked shots10
5Giveaways8
10Takeaways9

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

Florida Panthers

Forward lines

  1. bestJokinen – Huberdeau – Barkov7:44

    xG 0.13–0.06 (70%)attempts 7–8goals 0–0

  2. Thornton – MacKenzie – Kopecky3:20

    xG 0.17–0.16 (52%)attempts 2–3goals 0–0

  3. Boyes – Upshall – Bjugstad9:50

    xG 0.24–0.38 (39%)attempts 7–14goals 0–0

  4. Fleischmann – Bergenheim – Bolland5:39

    xG 0.13–0.41 (25%)attempts 3–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. Olsen – Gudbranson8:54

    xG 0.27–0.26 (50%)attempts 5–10goals 1–0

  2. Campbell – Ekblad14:36

    xG 0.30–0.38 (44%)attempts 12–12goals 0–0

  3. Mitchell – Kulikov11:57

    xG 0.06–0.57 (10%)attempts 7–15goals 0–0

Tampa Bay Lightning

Forward lines

  1. bestStamkos – Johnson – Palat9:41

    xG 0.44–0.06 (89%)attempts 17–3goals 0–0

  2. Connolly – Kucherov – Namestnikov4:00

    xG 0.30–0.03 (90%)attempts 7–1goals 0–1

  3. Kucherov – Namestnikov – Brown2:22

    xG 0.12–0.01 (94%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  4. Morrow – Boyle – Brown5:32

    xG 0.02–0.05 (23%)attempts 1–6goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCarle – Sustr11:23

    xG 0.60–0.35 (63%)attempts 15–6goals 0–1

  2. Stralman – Hedman11:24

    xG 0.29–0.24 (55%)attempts 12–10goals 0–0

  3. Garrison – Gudas11:45

    xG 0.22–0.19 (54%)attempts 10–10goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

TBL 2.8 xGFLA 1.3 xG
-0.500.511.522.53P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

TBLFLA

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

TBL's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line TBL is favoured, below it FLA. Dots are goals.

Excitement 72/100 · #280 of 1230 this seasonSwing 1.97 · 5 goals in reachComeback index 33% (winner's lowest chance)
FLA 100%5050%50TBL 100%P1P2P3OTEndBiggest swing +32 pts

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, Tampa Bay Lightning win this game 78% of the time.

TBL winsFLA wins

Simulated goal difference (TBL − FLA), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).