Skip to content
Ice Lab

Thu, Oct 16, 2014·STAPLES Center, Los Angeles

St. Louis Blues 0, Los Angeles Kings 1 (SO)

Expected result

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 82% of the time.

LAK winsSTL wins

By period

Goals and shots on goal in each period.

TeamP1P2P3OTSOTotal
STL09014016040043
LAK070308001118

Goals, with shots on goal in grey.

Scoring

Every goal, with the change it made to the home team's win probability.

  1. No goals in regulation or overtime.

Shootout

  1. 1. LAK Jeff Carter scored
  2. 2. STL T.J. Oshie stopped
  3. 3. LAK Anze Kopitar stopped
  4. 4. STL Alexander Steen stopped
  5. 5. LAK Tyler Toffoli stopped
  6. 6. STL Vladimir Tarasenko stopped
Penalties (10)
  1. P1 0:22LAKJarret Stoll: Roughing2 min
  2. P1 8:35STLVladimir Tarasenko: Holding the stick2 min
  3. P1 10:38LAKJustin Williams: Too many men on the ice2 min
  4. P1 17:25STLSteve Ott: Charging2 min
  5. P2 6:43STLIan Cole: Interference2 min
  6. P2 9:45STLAlexander Steen: Slashing2 min
  7. P2 9:45LAKJonathan Quick: Roughing2 min
  8. P2 11:03LAKJeff Carter: Hooking2 min
  9. P2 14:42LAKJustin Williams: Delaying game puck over glass2 min
  10. P3 7:52STLIan Cole: Cross checking2 min

Replay

Watch the game unfold on the ice: every shot, hit, turnover and faceoff appears as it happened, then fades. Drag the timeline to jump; goals are marked on it.

STL00 SOG · 0.0 xG

20:00

P1

0.0 xG · 0 SOG0LAK
46% to win54% to win
← STL attackLAK attack →
  1. P1 20:00Backes won the faceoff against Stoll
  • Goal
  • Shot
  • Miss
  • Block
  • Hit
  • Takeaway
  • Giveaway
  • Faceoff
  • Penalty

The numbers

Team totals, side by side.

STLLAK
43Shots on goal18
3.4Expected goals1.5
74Shot attempts49
41Faceoffs won33
4Power plays4
10Penalty minutes10
23Hits34
12Blocked shots18
9Giveaways23
2Takeaways3

Line combinations that worked

Model-based

Each team's forward lines and defence pairs at 5-on-5 (two minutes or more together), best first by expected goals for minus against.

St. Louis Blues

Forward lines

  1. bestSteen – Stastny – Tarasenko4:44

    xG 1.20–0.10 (92%)attempts 16–3goals 0–0

  2. Lehtera – Tarasenko – Schwartz6:12

    xG 0.34–0.08 (82%)attempts 7–4goals 0–0

  3. Lindstrom – Steen – Stastny4:29

    xG 0.16–0.03 (86%)attempts 5–2goals 0–0

  4. Backes – Oshie – Berglund9:33

    xG 0.20–0.11 (63%)attempts 9–8goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestCole – Pietrangelo15:03

    xG 0.87–0.20 (81%)attempts 21–10goals 0–0

  2. Bouwmeester – Shattenkirk11:24

    xG 0.73–0.25 (74%)attempts 16–13goals 0–0

  3. Jackman – Leopold9:56

    xG 0.23–0.01 (98%)attempts 8–3goals 0–0

Los Angeles Kings

Forward lines

  1. Williams – Richards – Kopitar5:24

    xG 0.05–0.05 (49%)attempts 2–6goals 0–0

  2. Carter – Richards – Pearson2:11

    xG 0.07–0.10 (42%)attempts 3–4goals 0–0

  3. Kopitar – King – Toffoli2:34

    xG 0.06–0.11 (35%)attempts 4–1goals 0–0

  4. Stoll – Brown – King6:24

    xG 0.01–0.08 (6%)attempts 4–5goals 0–0

Defence pairs

  1. bestRegehr – Doughty3:03

    xG 0.13–0.02 (88%)attempts 3–1goals 0–0

  2. Greene – McNabb2:28

    xG 0.03–0.06 (30%)attempts 5–3goals 0–0

  3. Greene – Martinez8:48

    xG 0.04–0.09 (32%)attempts 2–8goals 0–0

How the game flowed

Model-based

Chance quality for each side, minute by minute, with pressure underneath.

Expected goals flow

Running total of expected goals for each team. Steep climbs are spells of pressure; dots are goals. Shaded bands mark power plays (team colour), 4-on-4 or 3-on-3 (grey) and empty nets.

LAK 1.5 xGSTL 3.4 xG
01234P1P2P3OTEndxG

Tempo: attempts, hits and takeaways per minute

LAKSTL

Win probability

Model-based

How each goal and each minute changed the likely winner.

Win probability

LAK's chance of winning through the game. Above the middle line LAK is favoured, below it STL. Dots are goals.

Excitement 12/100 · #1070 of 1230 this seasonSwing 0.97 · 0 goals in reachComeback index 48% (winner's lowest chance)
STL 100%5050%50LAK 100%P1P2P3OTEnd

Did the better team win?

Every shot replayed 10,000 times, scoring with its expected-goal probability.

Based on shot quality alone, St. Louis Blues win this game 82% of the time.

LAK winsSTL wins

Simulated goal difference (LAK − STL), 10,000 replays

-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
+1
+2
+3
+4
+5
+6
+7

The outlined bar is the actual result (excluding the shootout).